Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;11(8):2151–2161. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz136

Table 1.

Statistical Analyses of Genomic Features: GC% (A), CDS (B), and Genome Size (C) between L. kunkeei and the L. micheneri Clade; L. micheneri and L. timberlakei

Compared Species/Groups Comparison Mean Shapiro–Wilk P Value Mann–Whitney W P Value
(A) GC%
 L. kunkeei (N = 15) and L. micheneri clade (N = 30) 36.8%, 30.5% 0.0002771, 0.0004398 480 2.238e-08
 L. micheneri species (N = 20) and L. timberlakei (N = 9) 30.5%, 30.4% 0.0001767, 0.008338 135 0.02629
(B) CDS
 L. kunkeei and L. micheneri clade 1,407, 1,540 0.4868, 0.0007096 29.5 1.276e-06
 L. micheneri species and L. timberlakei 1,502, 1,619 0.04671, 0.006994 11 3.834e-05
(C) Genome size
 L. kunkeei and L. micheneri clade 1,536,381, 1,500,683 0.1275, 7.966e-05 341 0.02045
 L. micheneri species and L. timberlakei 1,468,371, 1,567,777 0.0005775, 0.02314 18.5 8.158e-04