. 2019 Jul 26;15(7):e1008302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008302

Table 3. Percentage of Neandertal ancestry (and standard errors) in sf12 using diploid and pseudo-haploid calls and different subsets of the human reference genome.

Parts of the genome of East Asian origin were excluded due to their small total size.

Statistic^$	Full reference	European Reference	African Reference
$\frac{f_{4} (s f 12_{h}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{h}, C h i m p)}{f_{4} (V i n d i j a N e a_{h}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{h}, C h i m p)}$	3.17 ± 0.47	3.73 ± 0.82	1.76 ± 1.01
$\frac{f_{4} (s f 12_{h}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{d}, C h i m p)}{f_{4} (V i n d i j a N e a_{h}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{d}, C h i m p)}$	2.51 ± 0.46	2.97 ± 0.81	1.04 ± 0.99
$\frac{f_{4} (s f 12_{d}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{h}, C h i m p)}{f_{4} (V i n d i j a N e a_{h}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{h}, C h i m p)}$	3.00 ± 0.44	3.44 ± 0.77	1.38 ± 1.01
$\frac{f_{4} (s f 12_{d}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{d}, C h i m p)}{f_{4} (V i n d i j a N e a_{h}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{d}, C h i m p)}$	2.34 ± 0.44	2.71 ± 0.76	0.72 ± 1.01
$\frac{f_{4} (s f 12_{h}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{h}, C h i m p)}{f_{4} (V i n d i j a N e a_{d}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{h}, C h i m p)}$	2.98 ± 0.47	3.43 ± 0.83	1.79 ± 1.02
$\frac{f_{4} (s f 12_{h}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{d}, C h i m p)}{f_{4} (V i n d i j a N e a_{d}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{d}, C h i m p)}$	2.34 ± 0.46	2.71 ± 0.82	1.15 ± 0.99
$\frac{f_{4} (s f 12_{d}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{h}, C h i m p)}{f_{4} (V i n d i j a N e a_{d}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{h}, C h i m p)}$	2.89 ± 0.44	3.18 ± 0.78	1.46 ± 1.02
$\frac{f_{4} (s f 12_{d}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{d}, C h i m p)}{f_{4} (V i n d i j a N e a_{d}, M b u t i; A l t a i N e a_{d}, C h i m p)}$	2.19 ± 0.44	2.46 ± 0.77	0.88 ± 1.01

^$ d and h denote diploid and pseudo haploid-calls, respectively