Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 7;9:11438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47893-z

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Morphological characterization of CCD8Cas9 edited tomato lines. (a–i) WT- wild type plants with normal vegetative growth; CCD8Cas9 T1 transgenic lines of the CCD8Cas9-edited plants. (a–ii) Root morphology and (a–iii) plant height and branching of the wild type and CCD8Cas9 mutant. (a–iv) Comparison of tomato fruits obtained from the different CCD8Cas9 mutants in the T2 generation and wild-type plants. (b) Plant height after 3 month of growth, average ± SE (n = 11) (c) Quantitative estimate of secondary branches in 1 month old CCD8Cas9 mutated tomato plants, average ± SE (n = 7) (d) mature fruit size, average ± SE (n = 15) and (e) number of fruit produced average ± SE (n = 6), in CCD8Cas9 mutated lines and wild type plant. The different small letters not connected by same letter on each bar indicate statistically significant differences compared to wild-type plants (p-value < 0.05; Student’s t-test).