Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;58(31):3365–3376. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00237

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Negative power-law correlation between kcat,C and kcat,C/KC is not supported by the extended data set. In the model diagrammed in panel A, CO2-specific Rubiscos have low barriers to enolization and CO2 addition (first effective carboxylation barrier ΔG1,C), but lowering the first effective barrier necessarily increases the second effective barrier (ΔG2,C), reducing kcat,C. In this view, stabilizing the first carboxylation TS also enhances selectivity but also slows carboxylation (Figure S2). ΔG1,C and ΔG2,C should be negatively correlated, which would manifest as negative power-law correlation between kcat,C and kcat,C/KC under certain assumptions (Supporting Information). (B) The extended data set does not evidence the expected correlation (for Form I enzymes, R = 0.02 and p = 0.8). While previous analyses gave an R of approximately −0.9,6 the 95% confidence interval for R now includes 0.0. Restricting our focus to particular physiologies like C3 plants does not result in the expected correlation.