Table 3.
Multivariate analysis of dichotomised participation intention and perception of communicated norms – Experiment 2.
| N | Intentions |
Credible |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | OR | 95% CI | % | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Condition | |||||||
| Control | 343 | 10.50% | Ref. | 67.06% | Ref. | ||
| E1 – xi+3 with feedback | 370 | 17.84% | 1.920 | 1.230 - 2.997** | 45.68% | 0.415 | 0.305 - 0.563** |
| E2 - 8/10 no feedback | 337 | 27.75% | 3.398 | 2.228 – 5.185** | 27.49% | 0.188 | 0.136 - 0.258** |
| E3 - 8/10 with feedback | 382 | 28.19% | 3.481 | 2.265 - 5.352** | 21.36% | 0.133 | 0.094 - 0.189** |
| Baseline intention | |||||||
| Definitely not | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| Probably not | 2.857 | 1.916 - 4.260** | 1.164 | 0.879 - 1.540 | |||
| Initial expectation | 1.057 | 0.963 - 1.160 | 1.089 | 1.006 - 1.178* | |||
| N | 1,432 | 1,432 | |||||
| R2 | 0.127 | 0.179 | |||||
Logistic regressions adjusted for gender, age group, marital status, ethnicity, education, working status, car and house ownership and self-reported health status (* p<0.05; ** p<0.01) The full models are presented in Appendix 5.