Skip to main content
. 2019 May 14;35(4):584–590. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12188

Table 1.

Summary of studies included in the systematic review

Author Study design Sample size (n) Measurement 1st degree AVB prevalence Outcome (major arrhythmic events) Event [+]/event [−] Mean PR intervalc (event [+]/event [−]) Odds ratioc;95% CI; P‐value 1st degree AVB event [+]/event [−] Follow‐up months
Corcia 2017 Cohort 95 ECG 16 (17%) VT/VF/appropriate ICD shocks/ICD implantation 24/71 181.6 ± 53.3/161.3 ± 30.5b N/A 33.8
Corcia‐2 2017 Cohort 128 ECG 39 (30.5%) VT/VF/appropriate ICD shocks 40/88 181.35 ± 44.72/154.73 ± 29.64 3.42 (1.53‐7.64); 0.003 21
Juntilla 2008 Case‐Control 200 ECG N/A Syncope/VT/VF/appropriate ICD shocks 66/134 181 ± 34/178 ± 39b N/A None
Maury 2013 Cohort 325 ECG 113 (35%) Syncope/VT/VF/appropriate ICD shocks 113/185 N/A 2.61 (1.16‐5.85); 0.02 48
Migliore 2018 Cohort 272 ECG 45 (16.5%) VT/VF/appropriate ICD shocks 17/255 N/A 5.24 (1.90‐14.44); 0.001 85
Morita 2018 Cohort 471 ECG 69 (14.64%)a Syncope/VT/VF/appropriate ICD shocks 145/326 180 ± 29/174 ± 26 1.34 (0.78‐2.28); 0.29a, b 91
Ohkubo 2011 Cohort 35 ECG N/A Syncope/VT/VF 10/25 178.9 ± 20/168 ± 19.6b N/A 84.5

Abbreviations: AVB, atrio‐ventricular block; ECG, 12‐lead electrocardiogram; N/A, not applicable/available; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

a

Morita et al did not specify the type of atrioventricular block; it might not be first‐degree.

b

Not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

c

Calculated using RevMan 5.3.