Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 7;10:39. doi: 10.1186/s13293-019-0253-7

Table 3.

Relationships between PPT and PCS pain measures and time to Borg-8 (*statistically significant at p < 0.05; **statistically significant at p < 0.01)

Change in PPT and time to Borg-8
Pearson’s correlations Significance
UT Entire group 0.27 p = 0.170
Men 0.52 p = 0.058
Women − 0.06 p = 0.84
AD Entire group 0.32 p = 0.10
Men 0.66* p = 0.01
Women 0.15 p = 0.6
Pre-fatigue PCS Scores and time to Borg-8
Spearman’s rho Significance
Total (all 13 items) Entire group − 0.41* p = 0.032
Men − 0.17 p = 0.57
Women − 0.60* p = 0.025
Magnification (items 6, 7, and 13) Entire group − 0.31 p = 0.114
Men − 0.33 p = 0.244
Women − 0.44 p = 0.119
Helplessness (items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12) Entire group − 0.50** p = 0.007
Men − 0.13 p = 0.657
Women − 0.54* p = 0.047
Rumination (items 8, 9, 10, and 11) Entire group − 0.29 p = 0.141
Men − 0.06 p = 0.841
Women − 0.46 p = 0.102