Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 7;19:142. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0807-6

Table 3.

Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness based on the ROC Curves of Various Indices

AUC (95%CI) P-value Cut-off value,% Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Grey zone (%) Patients in the grey zone number (%)
PPV6 0.69 (0.52–0.83) 0.036 > 6 54 (33–74) 79 (49–95) 3.2 to 7.8 22 (58)
SVV6 0.56 (0.39–0.72) 0.563
PPV8 0.85 (0.70–0.95) < 0.0001 > 7 79 (58–93) 79 (49–95) 6.2 to 8.6 10 (26)
SVV8 0.77 (0.61–0.89) 0.0003 > 5 67 (45–84) 79 (49–95) 2.7 to 6.3 21 (55)
ΔPPV6–8 0.95 (0.83–0.99) < 0.0001 > 1 92 (73–99) 86 (57–98) 1 to 1.3 9 (24)
ΔSVV6–8 0.76 (0.60–0.89) 0.0006 > 2 46 (26–67) 100 (77–100) −1.5 to 1.4 21 (55)
%ΔPPV6–8 0.87 (0.72–0.96) < 0.0001 > 25 83 (63–95) 79 (49–95) 20.5 to 46 12 (32)
%ΔSVV6–8 0.71 (0.55–0.85) 0.02 > 16.7 67 (45–85) 79 (49–95) −32 to 95 27 (71)

ROC Receiver operating characteristic, AUC Area under the curve, CI Confidence interval, PPV6 Pulse pressure variation during tidal volume at 6 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW), SVV6 Stroke volume variation during tidal volume at 6 ml/kg PBW, PPV8 Pulse pressure variation during tidal volume at 8 ml/kg PBW, SVV8 Stroke volume variation during tidal volume at 8 ml/kg PBW, ΔPPV6–8 Change in value of pulse pressure variation after tidal volume challenge, ΔSVV6–8 Change in value of stroke volume variation after tidal volume challenge, %ΔPPV6–8 Percentage change in value of pulse pressure variation after tidal volume challenge, %ΔSVV6–8 Percentage change in value of stroke volume variation after tidal volume challenge