. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 8.

Published in final edited form as: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Oct;10(4):414–426. doi: 10.1177/1556264615599620

Table 4.

Multiple Linear Regression Predicting Satisfaction With the Process and Satisfaction With the Results

	Satisfaction with the process (n = 2,652)		Satisfaction with the results (n = 2,651)
	Regression coefficient	P	Regression coefficient	P
Model constant	2.60	<.001	3.21	<.001
All group^a	3.33	<.001	2.46	<.001
Binary group^a	3.49	<.001	2.46	<.001
Granular group^a	4.12	<.001	3.38	<.001
Male	−0.09	.596	−0.09	.608
Age in categories	−0.05	.179	−0.01	.760
Education	−0.05	.442	−0.10	.086
Hispanic	−0.22	.367	−0.35	.177
Caucasian race	0.16	.345	0.32	.073
Child with genetic diagnosis	0.03	.821	0.13	.265
It might help me prepare for the future^b	0.13	.528	0.13	.532
It might help me feel more in control over my future^b	0.51	<.001	0.22	.118
It might prevent me from worrying^b	0.06	.584	0.20	.076
It might help me seek medical treatments for my child^b	−0.10	.587	−0.12	.541
I fear that I might find out something I don’t want to know^b	−0.12	.227	−0.02	.854
Comfortable with the possibility of getting genetic research Results about your child from a biobank study^b	0.62	<.001	0.58	<.001

The comparison group is the “None group”

Response categories dichotomized into “Yes” (positive categories) and “No” (middle option and negative categories).