Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 5;25(8):447–458. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2019.0119

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Evaluation of angiogenesis in microvascular networks cultured with flow (Perfused) and without flow (Static). Microvascular networks from both experimental Perfused (B) and Static (C) groups became angiogenic after 48 h in culture, defined by an increase in vascular density (D) and capillary sprouts (E) compared to microvascular networks from freshly harvested mesentery tissue in the Unstimulated (A) group (t = 0 h). Angiogenic microvascular networks cultured without flow exhibited significantly (p = 0.0027) denser vascular structures compared to networks cultured with flow. Interestingly, no significant difference (p = 0.9269) was observed in capillary sprouting between Perfused and Static groups. Black, white, and striped bars represent Unstimulated, Perfused, and Static groups, respectively. The *** and **** indicate a significant difference of p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc method comparing vascular density between Perfused and Static groups. The “ns” indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) comparing capillary sprouts between Perfused and Static groups.