Table 2.
Relationships among working memory span (Ospan) and visuospatial working memory capacity (K) across task and drug conditions
Ospan | K3P | K3+2P | K5P | K3C | K3+2C | K5C | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ospan | – | ||||||
K3P | .058 | – | |||||
K3+2P | .220 | .880** | – | ||||
K5P | .115 | .665** | .627** | – | |||
K3C | .451* | .235 | .158 | .445* | – | ||
K3+2C | .028 | .318 | .112 | .621** | .634** | – | |
K5C | .196 | .160 | −.016 | .430* | .628** | .663** | – |
Note. N = 25. Correlation coefficient is Pearson’s r. P indicates placebo, C indicates cabergoline. 3, 3+2, and 5 refer to task conditions (3 targets, 3 targets plus 2 distractors, 5 targets).
p < .01,
p < .05