Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Jun;18(3):509–520. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0584-6

Table 2.

Relationships among working memory span (Ospan) and visuospatial working memory capacity (K) across task and drug conditions

Ospan K3P K3+2P K5P K3C K3+2C K5C
Ospan
K3P .058
K3+2P .220 .880**
K5P .115 .665** .627**
K3C .451* .235 .158 .445*
K3+2C .028 .318 .112 .621** .634**
K5C .196 .160 −.016 .430* .628** .663**

Note. N = 25. Correlation coefficient is Pearson’s r. P indicates placebo, C indicates cabergoline. 3, 3+2, and 5 refer to task conditions (3 targets, 3 targets plus 2 distractors, 5 targets).

**

p < .01,

*

p < .05