Table 4.
Number and duration of REACH-HF sessions for patients in the intervention arm
| REACH-HF (n=107) |
Qualitative interview sample (n=19) |
|
| Number of sessions per participant1; mean (SD), n; [min, max]; | ||
| Total sessions | ||
| Overall | 5.6 (2.7), 107; [0, 13] | 6.5 (2.2), 19; [4, 11] |
| Cornwall | 6.4 (2.4), 30; [0, 12] | 8.0 (2.6), 7; [4, 11] |
| Gwent | 5.3 (3.0), 23, [0, 12] | 6.7 (2.1), 3; [5, 9] |
| Birmingham | 5.8 (3.3), 27; [0, 13] | 6.3 (1.3), 4; [5, 8] |
| York | 4.6 (1.5), 27 [2, 9] | 4.6 (0.5), 5; [4, 5] |
| Face-to-face sessions1 | ||
| Overall | 3.6 (1.4), 107; [0, 7] | 3.9 (1.1), 19; [2, 7] |
| Cornwall | 3.1 (1.0), 30; [0, 5] | 3.9 (0.7), 7; [3, 5] |
| Gwent | 3.9 (1.8), 23; [0, 7] | 4.7 (2.1), 3; [3, 7] |
| Birmingham | 3.6 (1.6), 27; [0, 7] | 4.0 (0.8), 4; [3, 5] |
| York | 3.8 (1.2), 27; [1, 7] | 3.6 (1.1), 5; [2, 5] |
| Telephone sessions1 | ||
| Overall | 2.0 (2.1), 107; [0, 9] | 2.6 (2.1), 19; [0, 7] |
| Cornwall | 3.4 (2.0), 30; [0, 8] | 4.1 (2.4), 7; [0, 7] |
| Gwent | 1.4 (1.8), 23; [0, 6] | 2.0 (0.0), 3; [2, 2] |
| Birmingham | 2.1 (2.4), 27; [0, 9] | 2.3 (1.7), 4; [0, 4] |
| York | 0.9 (0.8), 27; [0, 3] | 1.0 (0.7), 5; [0, 2] |
| Duration of sessions (minutes; combined across participants); mean (SD) n, [min, max] | ||
| Face-to-face sessions1 | ||
| Overall | 70 (28), 380; [15, 170] | 72 (32), 75; [20, 170] |
| Cornwall | 75 (25), 92; [15, 145] | 83 (27), 27; [30, 135] |
| Gwent | 69 (26), 89; [20, 160] | 59 (31), 14; [20, 140] |
| Birmingham | 69 (33), 97; [15, 170] | 76 (38), 16; [30, 170] |
| York | 66 (26), 102; [20, 135] | 62 (28), 18; [20, 120] |
| Telephone sessions1 | ||
| Overall | 20 (9), 215; [2, 50] | 21 (12), 50; [2, 50] |
| Cornwall | 21 (10), 102; [5, 50] | 23 (12), 30; [5, 50] |
| Gwent | 14 (8), 32; [2, 33] | 14 (12), 6; [2, 33] |
| Birmingham | 20 (9), 58; [2, 45] | 17 (8), 9; [4, 28] |
| York | 19 (7), 23; [5, 35] | 21 (10), 5; [8, 33] |
REACH-HF, Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure.