Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: BRASPEN J. 2017 Jul-Sep;32(3):193–202.

Table 5.

FM by DXA and BIS for the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Longitudinal Data Set.

Timepoint n Mean difference, kg r RMSE, kg CCC r2 B-A Limits of agreement FMChamney, kg DXAFM, kg B-A PE r2 for the regression line through the B-A plot (P-value)
Pre-RYGB 25 −7.6 ± 6.7* 0.93* 6.47 0.81 0.86 −20.8 to 5.5 71.8 ± 17.2 64.1 ± 13.8 20% 0.27 (0.008)
6-months post-RYGB 16 −6.3 ± 5.9* 0.94* 5.80 0.85 0.88 −17.8 to 5.2 50.6 ± 16.3 44.3 ± 13.6 26% 0.22 (0.07)
1-year post-RYGB 15 −7.2 ± 4.3* 0.98* 3.45 0.86 0.96 −15.7 to 1.3 40.3 ± 16.4 33.2 ± 13.3 26% 0.53 (0.002)
Δ Baseline to 6-months 16 1.3 ± 5.3 0.68* 4.26 0.64 0.46 −9.1 to 11.8 −26.5 ± 5.6 −25.2 ± 7.2 - 0.11 (0.22)
Δ Baseline to 1-year 15 0.36 ± 5.1 0.84* 4.99 0.84 0.71 −9.6 to 10.3 −35.6 ± 8.9 −35.2 ± 9.2 - 0.002 (0.87)
Δ 6-months to 1-year 14 −1.3 ± 2.8 0.88* 2.83 0.86 0.78 −6.9 to 4.2 −9.2 ± 5.7 −10.6 ± 5.9 - 0.002 (0.87)

Abbreviations: FM, fat mass; DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; BIS, bioimpedance spectroscopy; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; RMSE, root mean square error; CCC, concordance correlation coefficient; B-A, Bland-Altman analysis; FMChamney, FM calculated from the Chamney model using BIS-generated BMI-adjusted ECWMoissl and ICWMoissl; B-A percent error (PE) calculated as limits of agreement for the difference between the two methods (1.96(SD)) divided by the mean for the reference DXA method × 100%. PE not calculated for FM change intervals because the magnitude of error in all cases was greater than the mean difference between methods. Values are reported as mean ± SD unless otherwise noted.

*

indicates significantly different, P-value <0.001