Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Sep 19;173(1):179–188. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4954-0
Primary model (n=303) Model with Patient-reported Importance Variable (n=303) Primary model (n=292) Model with Patient-reported Importance Variable (n=292) Primary model (n=303) Model with Patient-reported Importance Variable (n =303)
Adjusted OR (CI 95%) Adjusted OR (CI 95%) Adjusted OR (CI 95%) Adjusted OR (CI 95%) Adjusted OR (CI 95%) Adjusted OR (CI 95%)
Income
Greater than $100,000 (reference) (reference) (reference) (reference) (reference) (reference)
(reference)
Less than $100,000 0.55 (0.29, 1.04) 0.36 (0.17, 0.76) 0.57 (0.30, 1.08) 0.45 (0.23, 0.88) 0.51 (0.27, 0.96) 0.5 8 (0.31, 1.1)
Missing income 1.47 (0.57, 3.78) 0.86 (0.28, 2.35) 1.45 (0.56, 3.81) 1.18 (0.43, 3.16) 1.21 (0.46, 3.20) 1.4 8 (0.54, 4.03)
Cancer Shrunk
Not important to somewhat important - 0.08 (0.04, 0.20)
Important or very important - (reference)
Chances Lumpectomy
Not important to somewhat important - 0.43 (0.23, 0.80) - -
Important or very important - (reference) - -
Removed by Surgery
Not important to somewhat important - 2.1 4 (1.14, 4.01)
Important or very important - (reference)
*

Because those with missing data for these variables were excluded from the models, results for income vary slightly from Table 1. The models were also adjusted for age, stage and cancer subtype as in table 1. Analyses done with missing categories for all variables were similar.