Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: Glob Food Sec. 2016 Sep 15;11:72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2016.07.009

Table 1:

Countries and programs

Country Ghana Kenya Lesotho Zambia
CT Program Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) Cash Transfers for Orphan and Vulnerable Children (CT-OVC) Child Grants Programme (CGP) Child Grant (CG) model of the Social Cash Transfer (SCT) program
Target group Ultra-poor households with members in one of three categories:
1) single parent with OVC;
2) elderly poor;
3) people with extreme disability
Ultra-poor households with OVC Ultra-poor households with children (0–18 years old) Any household with a child under five years of age
Value of transfer during the evaluation 8G¢ monthly (1 eligible HH member)
10G¢ monthly (2)
12G¢ monthly (3)
15G¢ monthly (4+)
2007: 1,500 KSh monthly per HH
2011: 2,000 KSh monthly per HH
Start: 360LSL quarterly per HH
April 2013: 360LSL quarterly (1–2 children)
      600LSL quarterly (3–4)
      750LSL quarterly (5+)
60 ZMK monthly per HH (bimonthly payments)
Conditions Unconditional for people over 65 and with disabilities. “Soft” conditions for OVC caretakers. None None, but strong message that the cash should be spent on the needs of the children None
Additional programs/services National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) Food Emergency Grant
IE Design PSM RCT RCT RCT
Baseline survey December 2009/March 2010 April/June 2007 June/August 2011 October/November 2010
Follow-up survey(s) 2012 1st follow-up: May/July 2009
2nd follow-up: June/July 2011
June/August 2013 October/November 2012

Note: RCT-randomized control trial; PSM-propensity score matching; HH-household; KSh-Kenyan Shilling; G¢-Ghanaian Cedis; ZMK-Zambian Kwacha; LSL-Lesotho Maloti.