Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Popul Econ. 2016 Apr 29;29(4):1083–1111. doi: 10.1007/s00148-016-0596-x

Table 3:

Impact of CGP on women’s total fertility and related outcomes

All
Women
Main
respondents
Only
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)


Panel A: 24 months


Total
fertility
Currently
pregnant
Ever been
pregnant
Ever had
miscarriage
stillbirth or
abortion
Total
fertility
Currently
pregnant
Ever been
pregnant
Ever had
miscarriage
stillbirth or
abortion
Modern
contraceptive
use


Treatment −0.02 0.019 −0.025 −0.027 0.008 0.029 −0.007 −0.024 -
(0.84) (1.38) (1.89)* (1.82)* (0.37) (1.74)* (0.97) (1.31) -
R2 - 0.03 0.53 0.05 - 0.03 0.01 0.03 -
N 2,675 2,670 2,675 2,668 2,107 2,102 2,107 2,100 -


Panel B: 36 months


Treatment −0.013 0.004 −0.016 0.007 0.012 0.008 −0.001 0.011 −0.027
(0.60) (0.37) (1.23) (0.59) (0.66) (0.59) (0.21) (0.71) (0.76)
R2 - 0.01 0.08 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04
N 2,994 2,997 3,020 3,016 2,221 2,202 2,221 2,218 2,190


Panel C: 48 months


Treatment 0.005 0.001 −0.002 −0.021 0.011 0.004 0 −0.028 0.014
(0.28) (0.09) (0.16) (2.54)** (0.66) (0.29) (0.02) (2.66)*** (0.46)
R2 - 0.01 0.08 0.01 - 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03
N 2,986 3,025 3,030 3,028 2,206 2,205 2,206 2,205 2,173


Notes: Robust t-statistics in parentheses.

*

p<0.1

**

p<0.05

***

p<0.01.

Total fertility models run with Poisson models; all other outcomes use linear probability models.

All models control for baseline values of log (household size), log (distance to food market), highest grade attained, marital status, basket of prices, and current age.