Appendix 2:
Impact of CGP on women’s total fertility and related outcomes, Other Women in Household
Panel A: 24 months | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total fertility |
Currently pregnant |
Ever been pregnant |
Ever had miscarriage stillbirth or abortion |
|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
Treatment | −0.223 | −0.001 | −0.038 | −0.025 |
(1.04) | (0.10) | (1.06) | (2.26)** | |
R2 | - | 0.03 | 0.31 | 0.06 |
N | 568 | 568 | 568 | 568 |
Panel B: 36 months | ||||
Treatment | −0.196 | −0.014 | −0.054 | −0.003 |
(1.26) | (1.19) | (1.91)* | (0.29) | |
R2 | - | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.04 |
N | 773 | 770 | 773 | 772 |
Panel C: 48 months | ||||
Treatment | 0.178 | −0.009 | 0.023 | −0.012 |
(0.85) | (0.75) | (0.78) | (1.53) | |
R2 | - | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.05 |
N | 780 | 776 | 780 | 779 |
Notes: Robust t-statistics in parentheses.
p<0.1
p<0.05;
p<0.01.
All models control for baseline values of log (household size), log (distance to food market), Total fertility models run with Poisson models; all other outcomes use linear probability models.
highest grade attained, marital status, basket of prices, and current age.