Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Popul Econ. 2016 Apr 29;29(4):1083–1111. doi: 10.1007/s00148-016-0596-x

Appendix 2:

Impact of CGP on women’s total fertility and related outcomes, Other Women in Household

Panel A: 24 months
Total
fertility
Currently
pregnant
Ever been
pregnant
Ever had
miscarriage
stillbirth or
abortion
(1) (2) (3) (4)

Treatment −0.223 −0.001 −0.038 −0.025
(1.04) (0.10) (1.06) (2.26)**
R2 - 0.03 0.31 0.06
N 568 568 568 568

Panel B: 36 months
Treatment −0.196 −0.014 −0.054 −0.003
(1.26) (1.19) (1.91)* (0.29)
R2 - 0.03 0.3 0.04
N 773 770 773 772

Panel C: 48 months
Treatment 0.178 −0.009 0.023 −0.012
(0.85) (0.75) (0.78) (1.53)
R2 - 0.02 0.23 0.05
N 780 776 780 779

Notes: Robust t-statistics in parentheses.

*

p<0.1

**

p<0.05;

***

p<0.01.

All models control for baseline values of log (household size), log (distance to food market), Total fertility models run with Poisson models; all other outcomes use linear probability models.

highest grade attained, marital status, basket of prices, and current age.