Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: Demography. 2015 Apr;52(2):641–666. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0356-z

Table 5.

Robustness tests of Model H (sex ratio lagged 20 years), Model I (dummy variables for time periods), and Model 2 (regression of lagged sex ratio on sex ratio rather than change in sex ratio)

H: Sex Ratio Lagged 20 years I: Time Trend Dummy Variables Model 2: Outcome: Child Sex Ratio
Sex Ratio Lagged 20 Years 0.080*
(0.040)
Sex Ratio Lagged −0.893**
(0.049)
0.178**
(0.044)
Time Trend 33.242**
(0.964)
1.555
(1.319)
Time Trend × Sex Ratio Lagged −0.036**
(0.001)
−0.000
(0.001)
−0.002
(0.001)
Time Trend × District 0.001*
(0.000)
0.002**
(0.000)
0.002**
(0.000)
Total Fertility Rate 17.971**
(2.952)
4.506**
(1.579)
7.165**
(1.347)
Infant Mortality Rate 0.111**
(0.041)
0.023
(0.031)
0.030
(0.031)
% of Female Adults Literate 0.731*
(0.298)
0.570**
(0.146)
0.508**
(0.145)
% of Female Adults Literate Squared −0.002
(0.003)
−0.010**
(0.002)
−0.009**
(0.002)
% Rural −0.142
(0.119)
−0.169*
(0.084)
−0.163
(0.084)
% Scheduled Caste −0.449
(0.316)
0.071
(0.241)
0.123
(0.242)
% Scheduled Tribe 0.196
(0.303)
0.352*
(0.146)
0.369*
(0.147)
Time Dummy Variable 2 −7.721
(15.025)
Time Dummy Variable 3 8.290
(29.025)
Constant −171.038**
(47.541)
739.571**
(44.582)
820.582**
(40.429)
Observations 1,126 1,715 1,715
R2 .758 .644 .461
Number of Districts 585 590 590

p < .10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01