. 2019 Jun 11;266(9):2312–2321. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09401-1

Table 2.

Modelled association between FVC% and LOPD measures using cross-sectional analyses

Effect	6-min walk test	SF-36 PCS	Maximal inspiratory pressure^a	Maximal expiratory pressure^a	Medical Research Council
Intercept	112.92 (47.057)	0.0432	27.44 (2.863)	0.0107	− 1.39 (0.526)	0.1189	0.83 (0.439)	0.1834	48.53 (6.055)	0.0041
FVC	3.32 (0.469)	< 0.0001	0.12 (0.049)	0.0172	1.18 (0.1153)	< 0.0001	0.67 (0.107)	< 0.0001	0.47 (0.069)	< 0.0001

Effect

6-min walk test

SF-36 PCS

Maximal inspiratory pressure^a

Maximal expiratory pressure^a

Medical Research Council

Estimate (SE)

p value

Estimate (SE)

p value

Estimate (SE)

p value

Estimate (SE)

p value

Estimate (SE)

p value

Intercept

112.92 (47.057)

0.0432

27.44 (2.863)

0.0107

− 1.39 (0.526)

0.1189

0.83

(0.439)

0.1834

48.53 (6.055)

0.0041

FVC

3.32 (0.469)

< 0.0001

0.12 (0.049)

0.0172

1.18 (0.1153)

< 0.0001

0.67

(0.107)

< 0.0001

0.47 (0.069)

< 0.0001

^aAnalyses conducted using log transforms of both the outcome and FVC

FVC forced vital capacity, SE standard error