Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 8;9:11545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47929-4

Table 1.

Summary of bipolar nsPEF parameters that evoked maximal stimulation or cancellation of Ca2+ influx elicited by a 150 ns unipolar pulse.

Condition Effect on Ca2+ Fluorescence Intensity
Stimulation (%) Cancellation (%) P value
1. Untreated cells
Symmetrical bipolar pulse*
   ↑150 + ↓150 ns vs ↑150 ns 18 <0.01
   ↑200 + ↓200 ns vs ↑200 ns 26 <0.01
   ↑400 + ↓400 ns vs ↑400 ns 15 <0.01
Asymmetrical bipolar pulse*
   ↑150 + ↓200 ns vs ↑150 ns 29 NS
   ↑150 + ↓400 ns vs ↑150 ns 37 <0.05
   ↑150 + ↓800 ns vs ↑150 ns 47 <0.01
Asymmetrical bipolar pulse**
   ↑150 + ↓200 ns (2.4 kV/cm) 35 NS
   ↑150 + ↓200 ns (0.2 kV/cm) 4 NS
   ↑150 + ↓400 ns (2.4 kV/cm) 36 <0.05
   ↑150 + ↓400 ns (0.2 kV/cm) 27 NS
   ↑150 + ↓800 ns (2.4 kV/cm) 66 <0.05
   ↑150 + ↓800 ns (0.2 kV/cm) 43 <0.05
   ↑150 + ↓1000 ns (2.4 kV/cm) 86 <0.05
   ↑150 + ↓1000 ns (0.2 kV/cm) 36 <0.05
2. VGCCs blocked
Symmetrical bipolar pulse*
   ↑150 + ↓150 ns 60 <0.05
Asymmetrical bipolar pulse**
   ↑150 + ↓1000 ns (3.1/0.4 kV/cm) 58 <0.05

*3.1 kV/cm each phase.

**3.1 kV/cm positive phase, varied amplitude and duration of the negative phase.

NS: Not significant.