Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul;11(7):2737–2744. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.06.72

Table 3. Subgroups analysis.

Variables Number of cohorts AUC (95% CI) Variability (95% CI) Proportion of variability likely due to threshold effect Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI)
Assays
   EIA (Fujirebio) 6 0.84 (0.81–0.87) 0.97 (0.96–0.99) 1.00 0.66 (0.53–0.77) 0.87 (0.78–0.93)
   CMIA (Architect) 8 0.86 (0.83–0.89) 0.97 (0.96–0.99) 0.59 0.62 (0.43–0.78) 0.88 (0.79–0.93)
Participants
   Asian 10 0.85 (0.82–0.88) 0.98 (0.96–0.99) 0.08 0.66 (0.56–0.74) 0.88 (0.82–0.93)
   Europe 8 0.85 (0.82–0.88) 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0.60 0.64 (0.41–0.81) 0.88 (0.74–0.95)
Controls
   HC only 7 0.92 (0.90–0.94) 0.72 (0.39–1.00) 0.13 0.66 (0.53–0.77) 0.93 (0.89–0.96)
   HC and BLDS 6 0.83 (0.79–0.86) 0.82 (0.62–1.00) 0.17 0.78 (0.69–0.84) 0.74 (0.65–0.82)
   BLDs only 5 0.81 (0.77–0.84) 0.96 (0.93–0.99) 0.83 0.44 (0.23–0.68) 0.91 (0.77–0.97)

AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval; HC, healthy control; BLDs,, benign lung diseases; CMIA, chemiluminescent immunoassay; EIA, enzyme immunoassay.