Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 26;220(6):1034–1043. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz211

Table 4.

Association Between Respondent Plasmodium Infection and at Least Weekly Contact With Plasmodium-Infected Individual (Model A), and Respondent’s Household Plasmodium Infection Status and at Least Weekly Contact With Any Member of a Plasmodium-Positive Household (Model B), by Location of Contact

Individual Contact Models ORa (95% CI) P Value Household Contact Models ORa (95% CI) P Value
A1. Contact’s Plasmodium status, weekly contact B1. Contact’s household status, weekly contact
 Plasmodium negative, <weekly contact Ref HH Plasmodium negative, <weekly contact Ref
 Plasmodium negative, ≥weekly contact 1.16 (.39–3.43) .79 HH Plasmodium negative, ≥weekly contact 1.28 (.34–4.8) .72
 Plasmodium positive, <weekly contact 1.05 (.14–7.73) .96 HH Plasmodium positive, <weekly contact 1.01 (.26–4.01) .99
 Plasmodium positive, ≥weekly contact 1.06 (.15–7.38) .95 HH Plasmodium positive, ≥weekly contact 1.36 (.35–5.36) .66
A2. Contact’s Plasmodium status, weekly contact at respondent’s household B2. Contact’s household status, weekly contact at respondent’s household
 Plasmodium negative, <weekly hh contact Ref HH Plasmodium negative, <weekly hh contact Ref
 Plasmodium negative, ≥weekly hh contact 0.85 (.19–3.82) .84 HH Plasmodium negative, ≥weekly hh contact 0.77 (.14–4.33) .77
 Plasmodium positive, <weekly hh contact 0.96 (.22–4.06) .95 HH Plasmodium positive, <weekly hh contact 0.97 (.42–2.25) .95
 Plasmodium positive, ≥weekly hh contact 1.06 (.03–35.62) .97 HH Plasmodium positive, ≥weekly hh contact 0.94 (.15–5.86) .95
A3. Contact’s Plasmodium status, weekly contact at farms/fields B3. Contact’s household status, weekly contact at farms/fields
 Plasmodium negative, <weekly ff contact Ref HH Plasmodium negative, <weekly ff contact Ref
 Plasmodium negative, ≥weekly ff contact 1.38 (.42–4.53) .59 HH Plasmodium negative, ≥weekly ff contact 1.23 (.28–5.49) .79
 Plasmodium positive, <weekly ff contact 0.97 (.23–4.04) .97 HH Plasmodium positive, <weekly ff contact 0.95 (.37–2.47) .92
 Plasmodium positive, ≥weekly ff contact 1.18 (.07–19.15) .91 HH Plasmodium positive, ≥weekly ff contact 1.47 (.32–6.73) .62

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ff, farm and field; hh, respondent’s household; HH, contact’s household; OR, odds ratio.

aORs adjusted for village to control for differences in malaria prevalence between the 3 villages. Effect of social contact with a Plasmodium-infected individual on respondent’s risk of Plasmodium infection should be apparent as an OR significantly greater than 1 for exposure to a Plasmodium-positive individual with whom contact occurs at least weekly. All other ORs should approximately equal 1.