Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 9;14:195. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1170-x

Table 2.

Palatal anomalies in Chilean Patients

Palatal phenotype n %
Normal 65 30,0%
Submucous cleft palate 46 21,2%
“Infantile” velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI)a 43 19,8%
Velopharyngeal incompetence 22 10,1%
Cleft soft palate 16 7,4%
Cleft soft and hard palate 9 4,1%
Cleft lip 4 1,8%
Palatal anomaly, not specified 12 5,5%
Total 217 100,0%

a clinical signs of VPI, but nasopharyngoscopy not performed due to age