Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 9;38:348. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1334-5

Table 1.

Correlation between 5hmC level and TET family levels

Sample# 5hmc TET1 TET2 TET3
Rank log (T/N,10) Rank log (T/N,10) Rank log (T/N,10) Rank
1 1* 0.21 1 −0.21 − 1 − 0.4 − 1
2 − 1* − 0.48 − 1 − 0.26 − 1 − 0.54 − 1
3 1 0.15 1 − 0.04 − 1 0.28 1
4 1 0.16 1 0.20 1 0.31 1
5 −1 −0.53 − 1 − 0.49 − 1 − 0.46 − 1
6 1 0.12 1 −0.12 − 1 − 0.02 − 1
7 − 1 − 0.52 − 1 0.24 1 0.1 1
8 1 0.39 1 0.12 1 −0.29 −1
9 − 1 −0.52 − 1 0.38 1 −0.19 − 1
10 1 0.07 1 −0.22 −1 −0.09 − 1
11 −1 −0.74 − 1 − 0.39 − 1 0.28 1
12 −1 −0.04 − 1 −0.02 − 1 − 0.14 −1
13 −1 − 0.33 − 1 − 0.12 −1 − 0.51 − 1
14 1 −0.56 −1 − 0.58 − 1 0.41 1
15 −1 −0.45 −1 0.27 1 −0.35 −1
Kendall’s tau-b
 coefficient 0.873 −0.094 0.189
 P 0.001 0.724 0.480
Spearman
 coefficient 0.650 −0.139 0.449
 P 0.009 0.62 0.093

*1 represents the levels of 5-hmC, TET1, TET2, and TET3 in tumor tissues that were higher in non-tumor tissues, −1 indicates the opposite