Correction to: Diagn Pathol (2019) 14:58
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-019-0835-z
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported two typesetting mistakes in Table 1 of the publication. The original article [1] has been updated.
Table 1.
Histolog™ Scanner Acquire Images | |||||||
H&E-Images | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
0 | |||||||
1 | 2 | ||||||
2 | 2 | 5 | |||||
3 | |||||||
4 | 1 (ND) | 1 (NO) | 4 | ||||
5 | 3 (ND) | 2 (NO) | 1 (NO) | 30 | 33 |
The correct Table 1 is shown below.
Reference
- 1.Elfgen C, et al. Comparative analysis of confocal microscopy on fresh breast core needle biopsies and conventional histology. Diagn Pathol. 2019;14:58. doi: 10.1186/s13000-019-0835-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]