Table 4.
Parent themes and subthemes (based on PRISM framework)12 and Proctor et al's7 implementation outcomes
| PRISM framework: input determinants and process description | Proctor et al's implementation outcomes |
|---|---|
| Input determinants | Perceived acceptability |
| Technical factors | |
| Overall impression | |
| Accuracy | |
| Organisational factors | Perceived acceptability, feasibility, sustainability and cost |
| Governance and planning | |
| Availability of resources | |
| Training | |
| Feasibility | |
| Costs | |
| Importance to HMIS for mental health | |
| Supervision | |
| Integration with national HMIS | |
| Usability of these forms in future | |
| Behavioural factors | Perceived acceptability |
| Level of knowledge | |
| Competence and confidence levels for HMIS tasks | |
| Motivation | |
| Process description | Not applicable |
| (Mental health indicators and implementation – refer to Table 1) | |
| Tools used for HMIS | |
| Data collection | |
| Data processing and data analysis | |
| Use of information and feedback on HMIS to staff |
PRISM, Performance of Routine Information System Management; HMIS, health management information system.