Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2019 Aug 2;10:1695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01695

Table 2.

Regressions results.

	Work burnout – Model 1		Student-related burnout – Model 2		Satisfaction with life – Model 3
	Ticino	Naples	Ticino	Naples	Ticino	Naples
Step 1
Gender	−0.02	−0.19	−0.18^***	0.14	0.08^***	0.12
Age	0.00	0.02^**	0.00	0.03^**	−0.01^***	0.09
Dependent children	−0.08^*	0.00	0.01	−0.14	0.22^***	−0.02
Step 2
Optimism	−0.51^***	0.12	−0.43^***	0.01	0.99^***	0.83^***
Step 3
Workload	0.51^***	0.67^***	0.35^***	0.59^***	−0.21^***	−0.42^***
Colleague support	−0.06^***	−0.17	−0.04	−0.14	0.09^***	0.25
Organizational identification	−0.02	−0.27^***	−0.06^*	−0.17	0.06	−0.01
Intercept	2.786^***	0.802	2.873^***	0.322	2.805^***	2.640
R² Step 1	0.01^***	0.07	0.02^***	0.09	0.03^***	0.07
ΔR² Step 2	0.23^***	0.01	0.15^***	0.02	0.26^***	0.2^***
ΔR² Step 3	0.21^***	0.46^***	0.11^***	0.29	0.03^***	0.1^***
R² total	0.45^***	0.54^***	0.29^***	0.39^***	0.32^***	0.37^***

The β coefficients reported are relative to Step 3. Independent variables: gender 0 = male, 1 = female; dependent children 0 = no, 1 = yes.

^*

p < 0.05;

^**

p < 0.01;

^***

p < 0.001.