Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 13;65(4):467–481. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoy096

Table 1.

Threshold E-values for the “blue” and “green” spectral regions for the 5 plant species showing no modulation in the UV region when considering green adaptation background and a color discrimination threshold value of 0.04 hexagon units (second column)

Species\spectral parameters Threshold E-value
Mean maximum E-value
Is iridescence perceivable?
“Green” “Blue” “Green” “Blue” “Green” “Blue”
Alyogyne huegelii 0.417 0.764 0.412±0.09 0.472±0.05 Yes No
Solanum laciniatum 0.406 0.786 0.477±0.04 0.497±0.02 Yes No
Lycianthes rantonnetii a NI NI NI NI NI NI
Tropaeolum majus 0.328 0.050 0.018±0.002 0.196±0.05 No Yesb
Hibiscus heterophyllum 0.804 0.709 0.493±0.01 0.378±0.08 No No
Pelargonium rodneyanum 0.572 0.847 0.350±0.11 0.474±0.05 No No

Mean E-values and standard deviations corresponding to the maximum E-value obtained on each of the n =37 linearized images representing various viewing points recorded for each species

a

Solanum rantonnetii potentially modulates the UV-sensitive photoreceptor in the honeybee; however, as this spectral region is beyond our current system capability, this species was not included in the reported results. NI, not included.

b

Perceivable iridescence mainly corresponds to flower regions not involved in sexual reproduction (Figure 5).