Table 8.

Effect of age on the association between IMDs and rTL.

Baseline
Category	IMDs status	Coefficient	p > |t|	95% conf. interval	p-value
	Controls	Reference
Total sample	Cases	0.101	0.001	0.044 to 0.158	<0.001
	Controls	Reference
Children	Cases	0.094	0.025	0.012 to 0.175	0.025
	Controls	Reference
Adolescents	Cases	0.110	0.007	0.031 to 0.190	0.007
12 months
Category	IMDs status	Coefficient	p > |t|	95% conf. interval	p-value
	Controls	Reference
Total sample	Cases	0.041	0.117	−0.010 to 0.092	0.117
w	Controls	Reference
Children	Cases	0.048	0.181	−0.022 to 0.118	0.181
	Controls	Reference
Adolescents	Cases	0.033	0.395	−0.043 to 0.109	0.395
rTL change
Category	IMDs status	Coefficient	p > |t|	95% conf. interval	p-value
	Controls	Reference
Total sample	Cases	0.021	0.608	−0.060 to 0.102	0.601
	Controls	Reference
Children	Cases	0.017	0.768	−0.098 to 0.133	0.768
	Controls	Reference
Adolescents	Cases	0.027	0.639	−0.086 to 0.140	0.639

Children, 7–11 years; adolescents, 12–17 years; reference, reference IMDs status during regression analysis.