Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2019 Jun 11;12(8):1171–1183. doi: 10.1002/aur.2154

Figure 3. Elevation of false positive rates depends on the magnitude of the social preference when EWOCs are used.

Figure 3

A) Distributions of average magnitudes of social preference indices across groups from the 29 reviewed studies. B) Plot of outcomes as a function of social preference magnitude when using EWOCs. C) Plot of false positive rate as a function of social preference magnitude when using t-test on social preference index. D) Distributions of magnitudes of social preference indices from all mice run in our lab (n=421). E) Power calculations showing required n per group as a function of the WT social preference index, to have 70%, 80%, or 90% power to detect a difference at 0.05. F) Same, replotting boxed region from E.