Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 7;7:e7372. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7372

Table 1. Comparison of the measurements of mean velocity (MV) and total work (TW) between the iLOAD® app and a linear encoder.

Variable Set iLOAD® Encoder p-value ES (95% CI) Pearson’s r (95% CI)
MV (m s−1) 1st 0.34 ± 0.10 0.35 ± 0.10 0.10 −0.15 (−0.34, 0.03) 0.942 (0.838, 0.980)
2nd 0.32 ± 0.11 0.34 ± 0.10 0.04 −0.25 (−0.49, −0.01) 0.903 (0.738, 0.966)
3rd 0.32 ± 0.11 0.35 ± 0.12 0.02 −0.21 (−0.39. −0.04) 0.950 (0.859, 0.982)
Total 0.32 ± 0.11 0.35 ± 0.10 0.02 −0.21 (−0.39, −0.04) 0.948 (0.854, 0.982)
TW (kJ) 1st 14.9 ± 5.2 14.7 ± 5.2 0.46 0.04 (−0.08, 0.16) 0.975 (0.928, 0.991)
2nd 14.5 ± 5.6 14.3 ± 5.6 0.49 0.03 (−0.07, 0.14) 0.981 (0.945, 0.993)
3rd 14.7 ± 5.5 14.4 ± 5.4 0.36 0.05 (−0.07, 0.18) 0.973 (0.922, 0.990)
Total 44.0 ± 16.1 43.3 ± 16.1 0.42 0.04 (−0.07, 0.16) 0.977 (0.934, 0.992)

Notes.

Mean ± standard deviation.

ES
effect size