Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;269(6):741–752. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0964-5

Table 4.

Sensitivity analyses: adjustment for comorbid emotional problems

Contrast N IRR (95% CI) P
MAOA-HL (females) × maltreatment 1095 2.97 (1.59–5.56) 0.0006*
MAOA-HH (females) × maltreatment 1.94 (1.02–3.67) 0.0427
rs4714329 GG (males) × smoking during pregnancy 2358 1.92 (1.27–2.91) 0.0021*
rs9471290 AA (males) × smoking during pregnancy 2358 1.97 (1.30–2.96) 0.0013*
rs11215217 TC (females) × maltreatment 1239 0.45 (0.27–0.74) 0.0020*

All analyses were adjusted for socioeconomic status, single-parent status, comorbid emotional problems scores, and the first ten genetic principal components, including covariate interaction terms for the G × E models. Comorbid emotional problem scores were dichotomized closest to the 67th percentile to reduce collinearity with the covariate interaction terms

G × E gene-by-environment interaction, IRR incidence rate ratio, MAOA monoamine oxidase A, MAOA-L/H MAOA low-/high-activity allele, ADHD attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

*Significant (i.e., corrected for multiple hypotheses) at α = 0.0031