Skip to main content
. 2019 May 27;69(1):94–105. doi: 10.1007/s12031-019-01336-6

Table 2.

Direction of changes and statistical significance of analyzed hydrophilic compounds of CSF fluid for MS vs control group

Compound MS vs control P value VIP value Published results
ppm Assignment
8.46 Formate 0.550
7.73 Hist 0.261
7.39 Phe 0.389
6.86 Tyr 0.872
5.76 Urea 0.006 1.57 ↓ (Sinclair et al. 2010; Koneczny et al. 2014)
4.12 Lactate 0.457
4.07 Myo-inositol 0.015 1.13 ↓ (Sinclair et al. 2010)
4.01 Betaine 0.804
3.52 Gly 0.782
3.36 1,3 dimethylurate 0.358 1.45 ↓ (Sinclair et al. 2010)
3.31 Cysteine 0.274
3.25 Glucose 0.693
3.21 Choline 0.008 1.82 ↓ (Sinclair et al. 2010)
3.16 Citrulline 0.166
3.05 Creatinine 0.007 1.19 ↓ (Sinclair et al. 2010)
3.04 Creatine 0.140
2.68 Citrate 0.569
2.42 Gln 0.872
2.38 Pyruvate 0.550
2.28 Acetoacetate 0.530
2.11 Methionine 0.550
2.24 Acetone 0.001 2.10 ↓ (Sinclair et al. 2010)
2.13 Gln 0.362
2.03 N-acetyl NH3 group 0.942
1.93 Acetate 0.942
1.72 Lys 0.872
1.47 Ala 0.849
1.34 Lactate 0.511
1.21 3-OH-butyrate 0.157 1.12 ↓ (Sinclair et al. 2010)
1.03 Val 0.257
0.96 Ile 0.140 1.09 ↓ (Sinclair et al. 2010)
0.9 Leu 0.052 1.18 ↓ (Sinclair et al. 2010)