Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 24;116(32):15930–15938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905068116

Table 5.

Comparison of DEMO domain assembly models with or without experimental data assistance

Domain Method TM-score RMSD, Å iRMSD, Å No. of clashes
Starting with experimentally solved domain structures
 2dom (N = 166) DEMO 0.78 7.3 5.5 0.59
DEMO-CL 0.85 3.6 2.0 0.45
DEMO-EM 0.89 3.9 2.7 0.23
 2dis (N = 81) DEMO 0.84 5.5 3.8 1.18
DEMO-CL 0.86 3.7 2.4 1.02
DEMO-EM 0.92 3.3 2.9 0.62
 All (N = 247) DEMO 0.80 6.7 5.0 0.78
DEMO-CL 0.85 3.7 2.1 0.64
DEMO-EM 0.90 3.7 2.8 0.36
Starting with I-TASSER predicted domain models
 2dom (N = 116) DEMO 0.67 9.8 8.0 0.56
DEMO-CL 0.70 8.0 5.3 1.49
DEMO-EM 0.72 7.2 6.7 0.60
 2dis (N = 41) DEMO 0.58 12.4 8.9 2.36
DEMO-CL 0.63 10.8 8.1 2.31
DEMO-EM 0.66 10.2 8.3 2.45
 All (N = 157) DEMO 0.65 10.5 8.2 1.03
DEMO-CL 0.68 8.7 6.0 1.70
DEMO-EM 0.71 8.0 7.1 1.08

Bold indicates the best result in each category. N, number of proteins.