Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jun 5;102(4):1143–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.053

Table 1.

Summary of human studies included in analysis

Reference Disease Modality
investigated
No. of
patients
Primary
set made
public
Total
NO. Of
features
Class of
features
Statistical
analysis
Type of
study

Aerts et al (4), 2014 NSCLC CT 52 Yes 440 FO, SM, TA ICC Repeatability, reproducibility
Balagurunathan et al (28), 2014 NSCLC CT 32 Yes 330 FO, SM, TA CCC Reproducibility
Cheng et al (29), 2016 NSCLC PET 56 No 12 TA ICC Reproducibility
Coroller et al (30), 2016 NSCLC CT 32 Yes 1603 FO, SM, TA ICC Repeatability
Desseroit et al (31), 2017 NSCLC PET, CT 73 No 49 FO, TA ICC Repeatability
Desseroit et al (32), 2016 NSCLC CT 32 Yes 34 FO, SM, TA Mean standard deviation Repeatability
Fave et al (33), 2015 NSCLC CBCT 10 No 68 FO, TA CCC Reproducibility
Fave et al (34), 2015 NSCLC CT 40 No 20 FO, SM, TA Spearman correlation Reproducibility
Fave et al (35), 2016 NSCLC CT 134 No 55 FO, TA Spearman correlation Reproducibility
Fried et al (36), 2014 NSCLC CT 91 No 30 FO, TA CCC Reproducibility
Huynh et al (37), 2017 NSCLC CT 32 Yes 644 FO, SM, TA ICC Repeatability
Kalpathy-Cramer et al (38), 2016 NSCLC CT 40 Yes 830 FO, SM, TA CCC Reproducibility
Leijenaar et al (39), 2013 NSCLC PET 34 No 108 FO, SM, TA ICC Repeatability
Mackin et al (40), 2015 NSCLC CT 20 No 10 FO, TA Mean standard deviation Reproducibility
Oliver et al (41), 2015 NSCLC PET 23 No 56 FO, SM, TA Average percentage difference Reproducibility
Parmar et al (42), 2014 NSCLC PET 20 Yes 56 FO, SM, TA ICC Reproducibility
Van Velden et al (43), 2016 NSCLC PET 11 No 105 FO, SM, TA ICC Reproducibility
Yan et al (44), 2015 NSCLC PET 17 No 64 FO, TA Mean standard deviation Reproducibility
Yip et al (45), 2014 NSCLC PET 26 No 4 TA Relative difference Reproducibility
Zhao et al (46), 2016 NSCLC CT 32 No 89 FO, SM, TA CCC Repeatability, reproducibility
Grootjans et al (47), 2016 Lung cancer PET 60 No 4 TA Mean standard deviation Reproducibility
Koo et al (48), 2017 Lung cancer CT 194 No 9 FO, SM ICC Reproducibility
Lasnon et al (49), 2016 Lung cancer PET 60 No 5 TA Mean standard deviation Reproducibility
Bagher-Ebadian et al (50), 2017 Oropharyngeal cancer CT, CBCT 18 No 165 FO, TA Mean absolute percentage change Reproducibility
Bogowicz et al (51), 2016 Oropharyngeal cancer CT 22 No 315 FO, TA ICC Reproducibility
Lu et al (52), 2016 Oropharyngeal cancer PET 40 No 88 FO, SM, TA ICC Reproducibility
Doumou et al (53), 2015 Esophageal cancer PET 64 No 57 TA Spearman correlation Reproducibility
Hatt et al (54), 2013 Esophageal cancer PET 50 No 10 FO, TA Mean standard deviation Reproducibility
Tixier et al (55), 2012 Esophageal cancer PET 16 No 25 FO, TA ICC Reproducibility
Hu et al (56), 2016 Rectal cancer CT 40 No 775 TA ICC Repeatability
Orlhac et al (19), 2014 Rectal cancer, NSCLC, breast cancer PET 28, 24, 54 No 41 FO, TA Spearman correlation Reproducibility
Van Timmeren et al (57), 2016 Rectal cancer, lung cancer CT 40, 40 No 542 FO, SM, TA CCC Repeatability
Guan et al (58), 2016 Cervical cancer MR 51 No 8 FO, TA ICC Reproducibility
Galavis et al (59), 2010 Various solid tumors PET 20 No 50 FO, TA Average percentage difference Reproducibility
Hatt et al (60), 2015 Various solid tumors PET 555 No TA Spearman correlation Reproducibility

Abbreviations: CBCT = cone beam computed tomography; CCC = concordance correlation coefficient; CT = computed tomography; FO = first order; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; MR = magnetic resonance; NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer; PET = positron emission to-mography; SM = shape metric; TA = textural analysis.