Table 2.
Summary of glucosinolate content of Eruca sativa as reported in recent studies. Concentrations are expressed as mg.g−1 dw of sinigrin and the values presented represent the average concentrations of all tested cultivars.
| Reference | No. of cultivars tested | Cultivation Environment | Time Point of Sampling | Days After Sowing | Progoitrin | Glucoraphanin | Glucoalyssin | Glucosinalbin | Gluconapin | Diglucothiobeinin | Glucoiberverin | Glucosativin | 4-Hydroxyglucobrassicin | Glucobrassicanapin | Gluconapoleiferin | Dimeric glucosativin | Glucoerucin | Glucobrassicin | Gluconasturtiin | 4-Methoxyglucobrassicin | Neoglucobrassicin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bennett et al. (2007) | 34 | CE | PH | 4–8 | nd | 1.2 | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | 3.6 | nd | nd | nd | nr | 2.9 | tr | nd | nd | nd | 7.8 |
| Bell, Yahya, et al. (2017) | 5 | F | PH | 12 | nd | 1.1 | nd | nd | nd | 0.2 | tr | 0.4 | nd | nd | nd | 0.1 | 0.1 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 1.8 |
| Bell et al. (2015) | 28 | CE | H | 30 | nd | 0.2 | tr | nd | nd | tr | tr | 3.9 | tr | nd | nd | 2.2 | 0.2 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 6.7 |
| Selma et al. (2010) | 1 | CE | H | 35 | nd | 4.6 | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | 10.8 | nd | nd | nd | nr | 2.9 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 18.3 |
| Jin et al. (2009) | 1 | CE | H | 56 | nd | 0.3 | nd | nd | nd | 1.4 | 0.7 | 4.2 | nd | nd | nd | nr | tr | nd | nd | nd | nd | 6.6 |
| Pasini et al. (2012) | 32 | F | H | ? | 0.1 | 0.5 | tr | tr | nd | 0.1 | nd | nr | tr | nd | nd | 0.5 | 0.3 | tr | nd | nd | nd | 1.6 |
| Ku et al. (2016) | 39 | G | H | 30 | tr | 2.6 | nd | nd | tr | 0.7 | nd | nd | tr | nd | nd | 7.5 | 1.8 | tr | nd | tr | nd | 13.7 |
| Chun et al. (2015) | 1 | G | H | 63 | nd | 0.8 | tr | nd | nd | 0.2 | nd | nr | nd | 0.1 | nd | 2.5 | 1.9 | tr | nd | 0.3 | nd | 6.7 |
| Chun, Arasu, Lim, and Kim (2013) | 15 | G | H | 69 | nd | 0.8 | nd | nd | nd | 0.1 | nd | nd | nd | tr | nd | 5.0 | 1.0 | tr | 0.1 | 0.3 | nd | 7.9 |
| Taranto et al. 2016 | 21 | G | H | 42–70 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 0.6 | nd | nd | 6.8 | nd | 3.3 | nd | nd | nd | 9.8 | 5.4 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 29.5 |
| Kim and Ishii (2006) | 1 | Hy | H | 49 | nd | 0.5 | nd | nd | nd | 0.3 | nd | nr | nd | nd | nd | 2.3 | 1.3 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 4.4 |
| Bell, Yahya, et al. (2017) | 5 | F | H | 22 | nd | 1.0 | nd | nd | nd | 0.1 | tr | 0.7 | nd | nd | nd | 0.1 | 0.6 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 2.4 |
| 5 | F | PT | 25 | nd | 1.4 | nd | nd | nd | 0.1 | tr | 1.1 | nd | nd | nd | tr | 0.8 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 3.4 | |
| 5 | F | PR | 26 | nd | 1.0 | nd | nd | nd | 0.1 | nd | 1.6 | nd | nd | nd | 0.2 | 0.8 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 3.6 | |
| 5 | F | PW | 26 | nd | 1.7 | nd | nd | nd | 0.2 | nd | 3.4 | nd | nd | nd | 0.3 | 1.3 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 6.8 | |
| 5 | F | SL0 | 27 | nd | 1.7 | nd | nd | nd | 0.2 | tr | 3.3 | nd | nd | nd | 0.6 | 0.4 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 6.0 | |
| 5 | F | SL2 | 29 | nd | 1.8 | nd | nd | nd | tr | nd | 3.1 | 0.1 | nd | nd | 0.7 | 1.1 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 6.8 | |
| 5 | F | SL5 | 32 | nd | 1.8 | nd | nd | nd | 0.1 | tr | 2.3 | nd | nd | nd | 0.6 | 1.0 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 5.9 | |
| 5 | F | SL7 | 34 | nd | 1.4 | nd | nd | nd | tr | tr | 4.1 | nd | nd | nd | 1.0 | 0.6 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 7.1 | |
| 5 | F | SL9 | 36 | nd | 1.2 | nd | nd | nd | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.2 | nd | nd | nd | 0.7 | 0.7 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 3.9 | |
| Abbreviations: CE, Controlled Environment; F, Field; G, Glasshouse; ?, unknown; nd, not detected; nr, not reported; tr, trace amount; PH, Pre-harvest; H, harvest; PT, Post harvest transport; PR, Pre-washing; PW, Post-washing; SLn, Shelf life day. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reference | No. of cultivars tested | Cultivation Environment | Time Point of Sampling | Days After Sowing | Progoitrin | Glucoraphanin | Glucoalyssin | Diglucothiobeinin | Glucoiberverin | Glucosativin | 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin | Dimeric glucosativin | Glucoerucin | Glucobrassicin | Gluconasturtiin | 4-methoxyglucobrassicin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bennett et al. (2007) | 3 | CE | PH | 4–7 | nd | 0.4 | nd | nd | nd | 9.4 | nd | nr | 0.3 | tr | nd | nd | 10.1 |
| Bell et al. (2015) | 7 | CE | H | 30 | nd | 0.2 | nd | nd | tr | 2.4 | tr | 4.7 | 0.2 | nd | nd | nd | 7.7 |
| Jin et al. (2009) | 1 | CE | H | 56 | nd | 0.4 | nd | 1.1 | 0.9 | 3.6 | nd | nr | 0.8 | nd | nd | nd | 6.8 |
| Pasini et al. (2012) | 5 | F | H | ? | 0.2 | 0.4 | tr | 0.1 | nd | nr | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | tr | nd | nd | 1.7 |
| Chun et al. (2013) | 1 | G | H | 69 | nd | 1.1 | nd | 0.1 | nd | nr | nd | 2.8 | 1.7 | tr | 0.1 | 0.3 | 6.2 |
| Taranto et al. (2016) | 16 | G | H | 42–70 | 0.4 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 3.5 | nd | 2.0 | nd | 5.5 | 2.2 | nd | nd | nd | 19.0 |
| Bell, Yahya, et al. (2017) | 1 | F | PT | 25 | nd | 1.9 | nd | 0.5 | nd | 5.4 | nd | tr | 0.1 | nd | nd | nd | 8.0 |
| 1 | F | PR | 26 | nd | 2.1 | nd | 0.2 | nd | 2.5 | nd | 0.6 | 1.4 | nd | nd | nd | 7.0 | |
| 1 | F | PW | 26 | nd | 1.8 | nd | 0.6 | nd | 2.9 | nd | 0.5 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 5.8 | |
| 1 | F | SL0 | 27 | nd | 1.6 | nd | 0.5 | tr | 1.5 | nd | 0.5 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 4.1 | |
| 1 | F | SL2 | 29 | nd | 0.7 | nd | 0.2 | nd | 7.1 | nd | 0.9 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 9.0 | |
| 1 | F | SL5 | 32 | nd | 1.4 | nd | 0.2 | tr | 7.4 | nd | 0.1 | 0.5 | nd | nd | nd | 9.6 | |
| 1 | F | SL7 | 34 | nd | 1.3 | nd | nd | nd | 7.6 | nd | 2.2 | 0.5 | nd | nd | nd | 11.5 | |
| 1 | F | SL9 | 36 | nd | 1.5 | nd | 0.1 | nd | 5.6 | nd | 0.4 | 0.8 | nd | nd | nd | 8.5 |
Abbreviations: CE, Controlled Environment; F, Field; Hy, Hydroponic; ?, unknown; nd, not detected; nr, not reported; tr, trace amount; PH, Pre-harvest; H, harvest; PT, Post harvest transport; PR, Pre-washing; PW, Post-washing; SLn, Shelf life day.