Skip to main content
. 2019 May 11;1(2):99–106. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbz006

Table 2.

Agreement between BI-RADS and Volumetric Percent Density Grades by Patient and Control Participant Status

BI-RADS density VPD fatty VPD scattered VPD het VPD dense Total
(a) Control participants
 1. Fatty 388 (79%) 98 (20%) 6 (1%) 0 (0%) 492 (100%)
 2. Scattered 217 (25%) 445 (51%) 208 (24%) 8 (1%) 878 (100%)
 3. Heterogeneous 4 (1%) 116 (17%) 434 (64%) 124 (18%) 678 (100%)
 4. Dense 0 (0%) 2 (1%) 32 (16%) 161 (83%) 195 (100%)
 Total 609 (27%) 661 (29%) 680 (30%) 293 (13%) 2243 (100%)
(b) Case participants Case
 1. Fatty 59 (78%) 16 (21%) 1 (1%) 0 (0%) 76 (100%)
 2. Scattered 50 (26%) 101 (53%) 35 (19%) 3 (2%) 189 (100%)
 3. Heterogeneous 5 (3%) 36 (22%) 93 (57%) 29 (18%) 163 (100%)
 4. Dense 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (15%) 39 (85%) 46 (100%)
 Total 114 (24%) 153 (32%) 136 (29%) 71 (15%) 474 (100%)