Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 7;7(3):334–364. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smy019

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Comparison of Metrics for Kish Versus DP neff Methods, for Each of Six CIs Under 108 Simulation Settings with c =7. Plotted points are y = 100 times ratio of widths for Kish neff method over DP, versus x = 100 times ratio of noncoverage for Kish neff method over noncoverage for DP. Points with below-nominal DP coverage plotted in cyan (gray in print version). Vertical line indicates coverage ratio 1, horizontal line width-ratio 1.