Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 8;11:7537–7556. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S181439

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Overview of available treatment options for refractory carcinoid syndrome. Level of recommendation is classified as strong (positive) when there is literature available showing positive results and improvement of patient symptoms; weak (negative) if literature has shown no benefit on management of carcinoid syndrome; middle (unclear) if controversy exists. Level of evidence is classified as follows: Level A: there exists a meta-analysis of high standard or several randomized trials with consistent results; Level B: if randomized studies (level B1), therapeutic trials, quasi-experimental trials, or comparisons of populations (level B2) provide consistent results when considered together; Level C: there exist studies, therapeutic trials, quasi-experimental trials, or comparisons of populations, of which the results are not consistent when considered together; Level D: if either scientific data do not exist or there is only a series of cases; expert agreement: data do not exist but the experts are unanimous in their judgment.

Note: ↑, Increased.

Abbreviations: SSA, somatostatin analogs; PRRT, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, INFα, alpha-interferon.