Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2019 Feb 12;12(4):280–289. doi: 10.1007/s12265-019-09866-5

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics in all patients and stratified by LVEF recovery status

Overall (n=98) LVEF Recovered (n=36) 36.7% LVEF Not recovered (n=62) 63.3% *p
Age (years) 49.5 ± 17.0 47.0 ± 13.0 50.0 ± 18.0 0.463
Female sex 28 (28.6%) 15 (41.7%) 13 (21.0%) 0.029
Self-reported whites 78 (79.6%) 29 (80.6%) 49 (79.0%) 1.000
Self-reported blacks 19 (19.4%) 7 (19.4%) 12 (19.4%)
Ischemic Etiology 10 (17.2%) 3 (13.6%) 7 (19.4%) 0.727
Diabetes 45 (46.4%) 19 (52.8%) 26 (42.6%) 0.333
Atrial fibrillation 35 (35.7%) 15 (41.7%) 20 (32.3%) 0.349
Stage of chronic kidney disease 1.0 ± 1.5 1.0 ± 1.3 1.0 ± 1.6 0.873
Serum creatinine (mg/dL) 1.1 ± 0.4 1.0 ± 0.4 1.1 ± 0.4 0.435
BMI (kg/m2) 29.0 ± 9.2 29.7 ± 10.5 28.1 ± 10.3 0.511
SBP (mmHg) 118.0 ± 20.0 120.0 ± 22.0 116.6 ± 19.0 0.084
Heart Rate (bpm) 80.0 ± 13.0 80.0 ± 13.3 80.0 ± 15.0 0.944
QRS Duration (ms) 110.0 ± 48.0 98.0 ± 26.0 114.0 ± 46.0 0.139
NYHA functional class 2.8 ± 0.9 2.5 ± 0.9 3.0 ± 0.8 0.063
Left bundle branch block 35 (36.5%) 11 (30.6%) 24 (40.0%) 0.352
Baseline LVEF (%) 20 ± 11 20 ± 9 20 ± 11 0.953
Follow-up LVEF (%) 25 ± 36 55 ± 8 20 ± 12 <.0001
Change in LVEF (%) 2 ± 34 35 ± 13 -3 ± 9 <.0001
Time between baseline and follow-up LVEFs (years) 4.4 ± 7.2 4.1 ± 5.3 4.5 ± 8.0 0.565
ADRB1 Gly49 carriers 29 (29.6%) 4 (11.1%) 25 (40.3%) 0.002
ADRB1 Gly389 carriers 46 (48.9%) 21 (60.0%) 25 (42.4%) 0.098
Deaths 53 (54.1%) 20 (55.6%) 33 (53.2%) 0.823

ADRB1 = gene for the beta-1 adrenergic receptor; BMI = body mass index; Gly = glycine; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA = New York Heart Association functional class; SBP = systolic blood pressure; Ser = serine

*

p-value for patients with LVEF recovery to ≥ 40% versus patients with follow-up EF < 40%. Bolded p-values indicate statistical significance

Reported as mean ± sd instead of median ± interquartile range because the medians were identical and thus did not reveal subtle differences in the values