Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 13;10(8):611. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1860-2

Table 3.

Primary samples derived of myeloma patients

Patient# Sample# Age Gender Ig subtype Stage Therapies FISH
1 1 64 f IgG lambda III A None Tri9q
2 64 f IgG lambda III A 3× RADa Tri9q
2 3 50 m IgG kappa III A Dexab 4× RAD 2× HD-Melc Lend Normal
3 4 73 m IgG kappa I A None Hyperdiploide CMYC-Rearrangement
4 5 58 f IgG lambda I A None Amp1q21
5 6 78 f IgG lambda II A None
6 7 72 m IgG kappa I A None
7 8 43 m IgA kappa III A None Hyperdiploid
8 9 68 f IgG kappa III A None Hyperdiploid
9 10 49 f IgG kappa III A None Tri9q
10 11 61 m Kappa LC III B 3× ID > 2× HD-Mel; VRCDe > HD-Mel; VRCD Normal
11 12 67 m IgG lambda II A None Hyperdiploid
12 13 62 m Kappa LC II A None Tri1q

aradiation

bdexamethason

chigh-dose melphalan

dlenalodimide

ebortezomib dexamethasone thalidomide cyclophosphamide