Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Aug 12;9:11639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48240-y

Exploring evolution and diversity of Chinese Dipterocarpaceae using next-generation sequencing

Tijana Cvetković 1,#, Damien Daniel Hinsinger 1,3,#, Joeri Sergej Strijk 1,2,3,✉,#
PMCID: PMC6690942  PMID: 31406227

Abstract

Tropical forests, a key-category of land ecosystems, are faced with the world’s highest levels of habitat conversion and associated biodiversity loss. In tropical Asia, Dipterocarpaceae are one of the economically and ecologically most important tree families, but their genomic diversity and evolution remain understudied, hampered by a lack of available genetic resources. Southern China represents the northern limit for Dipterocarpaceae, and thus changes in habitat ecology, community composition and adaptability to climatic conditions are of particular interest in this group. Phylogenomics is a tool for exploring both biodiversity and evolutionary relationships through space and time using plastome, nuclear and mitochondrial genome. We generated full plastome and Nuclear Ribosomal Cistron (NRC) data for Chinese Dipterocarpaceae species as a first step to improve our understanding of their ecology and evolutionary relationships. We generated the plastome of Dipterocarpus turbinatus, the species with the widest distribution using it as a baseline for comparisons with other taxa. Results showed low level of genomic diversity among analysed range-edge species, and different evolutionary history of the incongruent NRC and plastome data. Genomic resources provided in this study will serve as a starting point for future studies on conservation and sustainable use of these dominant forest taxa, phylogenomics and evolutionary studies.

Subject terms: Molecular evolution, Phylogenetics

Introduction

Forests hold more than 75 percent of the world’s terrestrial biodiversity and provide products and services for socioeconomic development of millions of people1. Over the course of the last few centuries, over a billion hectares of forest lands have been degraded or deforested, which underlie broad scale climate changes, increases soil erosion, higher surface temperatures and intensity of dry-seasons2, creates food insecurity3,4, as well as patterns and pace of species extinction5,6. Tropical forests as a key-category of land ecosystems include some of the world’s most diverse habitat types, while simultaneously being faced with the highest levels of biodiversity loss.

Deforestation (in addition to the burning of fossil fuel) is a large contributor to the increase of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere to the highest level of the last 20 Myr7. During this century, expected widening of the tropical climatic belt could promote distribution shifts in tropical plant communities (towards higher latitude and elevation), altering patterns of local/regional endemism and increasing rates of extinction (e.g. temperate taxa on tropical mountains)8,9. It has been suggested the tropics already expanded in the last few decades10–14.

Tropical lowlands in South East Asia experience some of the highest levels of deforestation rates globally15, followed by the establishment of monotypic plantation forest (or land is left fallow)16. In lowland tropical Asia, Dipterocarpaceae are a dominant ecological and structural component covering vast areas and economically, they are the most important and valuable source of timber products. Studies on the effects of selective logging (with removal of approximately one third of all trees) on vegetation in Kalimantan showed that harvesting removed 62% of dipterocarp basal area17. This high proportion stresses the significant physiognomic and ecological role of Dipterocarpaceae and understanding both evolution and the distribution of genomic diversity in this family. Despite their important ecological and economical values, we know comparatively little about Dipterocarpaceae genomics, its geographic distribution and their ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions. It is vital to better understand the evolution and ecology of subtropical taxa first, as these can be expected to respond quickly to any major changes in poleward expansion of tropical zones, leading to fundamental changes in ecosystems, their composition and functioning18,19.

Dipterocarpoideae (i.e. Asian Dipterocarps) are spread throughout the Indo-Malayan realm (i.e. most of the South and Southeast Asia and the southern parts of East Asia), as well as in the Indian subcontinent. Indeed, insights on the evolution of Dipterocarpaceae and their historical distribution have changed dramatically since Udvardy20,21. The northern limit for the family in the Indo-Malayan realm is located in subtropical southern China. Therefore, southern China represents a large “colonization front” for tropical tree species, and studies of species found in this area are particularly interesting for monitoring habitat ecology, community composition and adaptation to changing climatic conditions.

In Asia, Dipterocarpaceae are facing both climatic and anthropogenic challenges to their distribution, ecology and persistence (patterns of phenology in widespread species (e.g. D. turbinatus, occurring in Indo-Burma, Indonesia and the Philippines), distribution as a result of shifts in climatic conditions22,23, genetic diversity of species24–26).

Herein, we aim to provide the first assessment of the genomic diversity in Dipterocarpaceae species found at the tropics-subtropics boundary by (1) comparing genomic diversity of species found at the northern margin of the Dipterocarpaceae distribution range, namely the Southern Chinese provinces; (2) analyzing how the nucleotide variability is distributed in the plastome and the Nuclear Ribosomal Cistron (NRC); (3) comparing both the intrageneric and intergeneric nucleotide diversity, as China has high generic but relatively poor species diversity (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Dipterocarpaceae distribution in the northern SE Asian and China :1- Viet Nam, 2- Thailand, 3- mainland China (the distribution range for Dipterocarpaceae species in China is below white line), 4- Hainan, 5- India and Myanmar, 6- Bangladesh and Cambodia, 7- Malaysia and Indonesia, 8- Laos, 9- The Philippines; distribution of species represented by different colours; countries grouped together represent the places where species occur at both places, areas with mesh patterns represent all places where Dipterocarpaceae are occurring, but not part of this study (Distribution data collected from Flora of China72, Tropicos73, GBIF74, asianplant.net75, Kew’s Plants of the World Online76, Kew’s World Checklist of Selected Plant Families77).

Materials and Methodology

The evergreen tropics (23.5°N to 23.5°S)27 is a zone with a non-arid, frost-free climate (only a wet and a dry season)28, while the subtropics are more loosely defined in their extent and location. Many plant taxa have their center of diversity in tropical regions, also have close relatives in adjacent subtropical zones29. Subtropical climates are characterized by warm to hot summers, and infrequent frost during cool winter28. Climate, geology, geography and time have shaped distinctive floristic compositions and species diversity that can be used to evaluate the dynamics of these forest communities30 positioned on the border of the subtropical and tropical zones. Indo-Malayan Dipterocarpaceae species are spread over tropical and subtropical region. Here we focus on the northernmost fringe of the Dipterocarpaceae distribution (northern SE Asia and China), and the species contained within this region (Fig. 1).

Individuals were collected in China (Hainan and Yunnan), both in the wild and in botanical gardens. Voucher materials were deposited in the Biodiversity Genomics Team herbarium (BGT), Nanning, China (see accession list Supplementary Table S1).

In this study we used six species belonging to the tribe Dipterocarpeae (Dipterocarpus turbinatus C.F. Gaertn., D. retusus Blume, D. alatus Roxb., Vatica mangachapoi Blanco, V. guangxiensis S.L. Mo and V. rassak (Korth.) Blume), and five species belonging to the tribe Shoreae (Hopea chinensis (Merr.) Hand.-Mazz., H. hainanensis Merr. & Chun, H. reticulata Tardieu, Shorea assamica Dyer and Parashorea chinensis Wang Hsie). Nine species of both tribes occur in China, and represent five genera in the subfamily Dipterocarpoideae, which contain almost half of all genera found in Asia. Due to continued uncertainty regarding the relationships of Dipterocarpaceae with other families in Malvales, we added eight outgroups spread throughout the order: (Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Gilg, Theobroma cacao L., Talipariti hamabo (Siebold & Zucc.) Fryxell, Hibiscus syriacus L., Gossypium barbadense L., Tilia amurensis Kom., Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench, Daphne kiusiana Miq.) and Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. We also added two additional species of Dipterocarpaceae (Dipterocarpus alatus and Vatica rassak) with a more southern distribution (SE Asia; Indonesia, Philippines and Papua New Guinea, respectively).

DNA extraction and sequencing

Total genomic DNA was purified from 0.1 g frozen fresh leaves with the Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd), following manufacturer instructions. After purification a 350-bp paired-end library was constructed using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit (Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA). Raw data were sequenced with the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform (San Diego, California, USA), with a paired-end read length of 2 × 150 bp. Libraries construction and sequencing were performed by Novogene (Beijing, China).

Dataset construction

To reconstruct high-quality plastomes, we used a genome skimming approach (i.e. bioinformatic sorting of highly repetitive genomic sequences, e.g. the plastome, the mitochondrial genome and the NRC) combined with both de-novo and reference-guided assembly. Because of the absence of complex structural rearrangements in the chloroplast genome, plastomes are more suitable for phylogenomic analyses than mitochondrial genomes. To investigate the presence of phylogenomic incongruence between the maternally inherited chloroplast genome and the paternally inherited nuclear genome, we also reconstructed the NRC.

Plastomes assembly

Draft chloroplasts were reconstructed with ORG.Asm v0.2.0531, using default settings. The raw reads and the resulting circular contigs were both imported in Geneious R10 v.10.0.5 (http://www.geneious.com)32. Raw reads were trimmed, removing bases from 5′ and 3′ –ends until all were with quality Q < 20 (i.e., with sequencing error rate lower than 1%). As some of the ORG.Asm assemblies resulted in several shorter linear contigs, these were extended by an iterative mapping approach in Geneious R10, until matching ends were found and a circular plastome could be constructed. The removal of assembly errors was done manually during the process of assembly and alignment.

To assess the assembly quality, reads were mapped against the curated ORG.Asm assembly or the consensus sequence from the iterative mapping, using a reference-guided method. Reads with less than 10 low quality bases and/or ambiguities were mapped using the Geneious R10 mapper. Using the ORG.Asm circular contig as a reference, the algorithm iteratively maps the reads against the reference, starting with the most conserved regions. These first contigs are then used as a “pseudo-reference” and refined or extended with the partially overlapping reads newly mapped. 1,000 iterations were performed with gaps allowed (up to 15% of the reads length), a word length of 14 bp and an index word length of 12 bp. The maximum mismatch per read and maximum ambiguities were set to 30% and 4, respectively. The “Accurately map reads with errors to repeat regions” option was checked, only reads assembled to the correct distance (i.e. ≈350–500 bp) were considered by the Geneious algorithm, and this information was used for scaffolding.

Positions under 5x coverage were masked (Ns) for the generation of a consensus sequence, despite we individually checked these positions to verify the base calling accuracy and their identity to the reference. These positions were accounted for the length calculation. The inverted repeat (IR) borders were carefully checked by eye for each species, no evidence for any structural change of these IRs borders were found, as the mapping depth and base calling were without ambiguity. We determined annotations for each newly sequenced species using cpGAVAS33, followed by manual adjustments. Sequences were aligned using the Geneious MAFFT v734 implementation in Geneious R10 with default settings.

Assembly of extended nuclear ribosomal cistron regions

Available nITS data on Genbank for the species in our study was limited to three species (Vatica mangachapoi, Hopea hainanensis and P. chinensis). Using P. chinensis (GenBank KR532475), we generated the extended NRC of all Dipterocarpaceae species in our study using an iterative mapping approach (i.e. reference-guided assembly), with medium-low sensitivity, and 1000 iterations. The NRC sequences were then annotated using Theobroma grandiflorum as a reference (GenBank JQ228378) in Geneious. Sequences were aligned using the Geneious R10 alignment with free end gaps. The complete plastomes and nuclear ribosomal cistrons will be submitted to DRYAD upon acceptance.

Intergeneric comparisons, interspecific comparison and phylogenomic reconstruction

A maximum likelihood (ML) tree was built using RAxML-NG v0.8.135. For evaluation of node supports we used standard bootstrap analyses with 1000 replicates35. In addition to plastomes ML tree, separate phylogenies for the Large Single Copy (LSC) regions, Small Single Copy (SSC) regions, and IR were built using the same parameters. We used ModelTest-NG v0.1.536 for choosing the model for our datasets (GTR + G4 for plastomes, NRC and LSC; GTR + I + G4 for total evidence of plastomes and NRC, TVM + G4 for SSC; TVM + I + G4 for IR) to find the best ML tree. ML trees were edited with the program FigTree v1.4.337 [http://treebioedacuk/software/figtree/]. We also conducted phylogenomic analyses on a combined plastome-NRC dataset using MrBayes v3.238. Metropolis-Coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MC3) sampling was performed with four chains running for 20 * 106 generations, sampling every 1000th generation and discarding the first 50% of sampled trees as burnin. We used the percentage of pairwise identity and the pattern of identities and regions of mismatch between two sequences to calculate pairwise distance. Repeated sequences for each species (forward, palindrome, reverse and complement sequences) were identified using REPuter39 as previously described (e.g.40,41), with 30 bp and greater than 90% sequence identity. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were found using MISA42 with minimum number repeats of 10, 5, 4, 3, 3 and 3 for mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexa- nucleotide, respectively. To identify regions with substantial variability, the complete plastomes of eleven Dipterocarpaceae species, eight species of Malvales and Arabidopsis thaliana were compared using mVISTA43,44, using Dipterocarpus turbinatus as a baseline for comparison of all other plastomes.

Results

We reconstructed plastomes and NRC sequences for nine Dipterocarpaceae species occurring in China and two additional species of Dipterocarpaceae (see accession list Supplementary Table S1).

Plastomes sizes and features

The plastomes lengths of our selected species ranged from 151,033 bps (Vatica guangxiensis) to 156,706 bps (Dipterocarpus turbinatus) (Supplementary Tables S2, S3). All individuals exhibited the typical organization of the chloroplast, with LSC, SSC regions and two IR copies of approximately 85 kbps, 20 kbps and 24 kbps, respectively. The overall GC content of all analyzed species was 35.2%, 31.9% and 43.1% in LSC, SSC and IR regions, respectively. In total, 125 genes were annotated, including around 88 protein coding genes, 31 tRNA genes and 8 rRNA genes.

NRC dataset characteristics

The NRC lengths of reconstructed sequences for the analyzed Dipterocarpaceae species ranged from 5,787 bps (Dipterocarpus turbinatus) to 5,830 (Hopea hainanensis) (Supplementary Table S4). NRC mapping depths were between 892X and 4,881× (Vatica mangachapoi and Dipterocarpus turbinatus, respectively) (Supplementary Table S4). 18S and 26S ribosomal RNA genes were highly conserved, whereas the 5.8S RNA gene showed higher level of variations. The most variable regions were both internal transcribed spacers, ITS1 (identical sites: 321; 85.1 pairwise % identity) and ITS2 (identical sites: 156; 88.5 pairwise % identity).

Repeat and SSR analyses

Using REPuter39, 50 repeats were found in Dipterocarpus turbinatus, D. retusus, Hopea reticulata, Vatica guangxiensis and V. mangachapoi, 49 in H. hainanensis, 48 in Parashorea chinensis, 43 in H. chinensis, 40 in Shorea assamica (see Fig. 2). Reverse (R) and complement (C) repeats were found only in H. chinensis and in S. assamica, represented by the lowest number of repeat sequences (1 complement and 2 reverse repeats with length of 30–39 bps in H. chinensis and 1 reverse repeat with length of 30–39 bps in S. assamica). In all species repeats were mainly distributed in the intergenic spacer regions between CDS and transfer RNA genes (Supplementary Tables S5 and S5.1). Interspecific comparison and analyses in the Chinese Dipterocarpaceae showed that S. assamica had the fewest number of repeats40. Forward and palindrome repeat sequences longer than 60 bp in the plastomes, followed by forward repeat sequences with a length of 30–39 bps (Fig. 2). Our results showed no clear pattern or structure according to the taxonomy.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Repeat sequences in nine plastomes of Dipterocarpaceae. Repeat sequences with length ≥30 bp and sequence identity ≥90% in the plastomes were identified by REPuter. C, R, F and P indicate repeat type C (complement), R (reverse), F (forward) and P (palindrome), respectively. Repeats with different lengths are indicated by different patterns. D.ret: Dipterocarpus turbinatus; D.tur: Dipterocarpus retusus; H.chin: Hopea chinensis; H.hain: Hopea hainanensis; H.ret: Hopea reticulata; P.chin: Parashorea chinensis; S.ass: Shorea assamica; V.guan: Vatica guangxiensis; V.man: Vatica mangachapoi.

Microsatellite regions in assembled plastomes showed differences in their numbers, with congeneric species showing dissimilarities in both numbers and spatial patterns of SSRs occurrence (Fig. 3). The highest number of SSRs was in the plastome of Hopea reticulata, and the lowest in Parashorea chinensis. Mononucleotide (approximately 50%) in all species. In the IGS region, 86.53% of all SSRs (mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, hexa-, c- nucleotide) were found, and remain 13.47% in CDS genes (Supplementary Tables S6 and S6.1). All analyzed species lacked some SSRs patterns (G mononucleotides and GA dinucleotides), with C mononucleotide found only in H. reticulata.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Number of simple sequence repeats in nine plastomes of Dipterocarpaceae. (mono-: mononucleotide SSRs; di-: dinucleotide SSRs; tri-: trinucleotide SSRs; tetra-: tetranucleotide SSRs; penta-: pentanucleotide SSRs; hexa-: hexanucleotide SSRs; c-: c-nucleotide SSRs. D.ret: Dipterocarpus turbinatus; D.tur: Dipterocarpus retusus; H.chin: Hopea chinensis; H.hain: Hopea hainanensis; H.ret: Hopea reticulata; P.chin: Parashorea chinensis; S.ass: Shorea assamica; V.guan: Vatica guangxiensis; V.man: Vatica mangachapoi.

Dipterocarpaceae phylogenomic reconstruction and comparison

Nodes in the ML tree based on plastomes were highly supported (bootstrap support = 100) (Fig. 4). Vatica diverged in the basal position with Dipterocarpus- Parashorea- Shorea- Hopea clade. Intrageneric branches in nearly all Dipterocarpaceae are very short, highlighting the low levels of genomic diversity among species. Dipterocarpus and Hopea formed distinct clades, interspersed with Parashorea chinensis and Shorea assamica (Fig. 4). Pairwise identity values underscore the low levels of variation (Vatica guangxiensis vs. V. mangachapoi share 99.4 pairwise % identity (126,811 identical sites), while Dipterocarpus alatus is different from Chinese species D. turbinatus and D. retusus (98.7 pairwise % identity; 128,274 identical sites). Hopea hainanensis diverged in a basal position in the genus relative to H. reticulata and H. chinensis (97.1 pairwise % identity; 124,614 identical sites). Substitutions and indels were spread throughout the aligned sequences of V. rassak and D. retusus (92.2 pairwise % identity, 121,685 identical sites).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Maximum Likelihood phylogenomic tree of Chinese Dipterocarpaceae plastomes sequences, in addition to Dipterocarpus alatus and Vatica rassak and outgroups sequences, retrieved from GenBank. Bootstrap branch support shown at nodes.

Phylogenies of the LSC, SSC regions, and IR, with some variation in the level of diversity confirmed the same evolutionary history as in the plastomes (see Supplementary Figs S1–S3).

Vatica rassak, widespread in Indonesia (Buru), Papua New Guinea and the Philippines, occupies a basal position compared to more northerly distributed V. mangachapoi and V. guangxiensis. Dipterocarpus turbinatus and D. retusus can be found from SE Asia to Myanmar-India, with the distribution range of D. retusus extending to Malaysia, Java and the Philippines. D. alatus with narrow, southern distribution from Thailand to Cambodia, is in a basal position to the Chinese Dipterocarps. Shorea assamica is widespread from India to the Philippines, whereas all analysed Hopea species, as well as Parashorea chinensis have a restricted distribution South China, North Viet Nam and Thailand.

Comparative interspecific NRC and plastome genomic analyses

In the NRC ML tree, Hopea formed a robustly supported clade, distinct to the Dipterocarpus and Vatica clade (moderate to highly bootstrap support: 70–100, see Fig. 5). Intrageneric branching order in Dipterocarpus was different from the plastomes ML tree. In the NRC tree, D. turbinatus was highly associated (bootstrap support = 99) in the basal position with the D. alatus- D. retusus clade. There were no ingroup differences of analyzed species belonging to the genus Hopea and Vatica between the NRC and plastomes trees (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Maximum Likelihood phylogenomic tree of Chinese Dipterocarpaceae NRC sequences, with Dipterocarpus alatus and Vatica rassak. Outgroups sequences were retrieved from GenBank. Bootstrap branch support shown at nodes.

Total evidence ML phylogenomic tree

Bootstrap supports for the ML tree of the combined complete plastomes and NRC were high (≥92) (Fig. 6b). The branch leading to the genus Vatica diverged from a clade containing Dipterocarpus, Parashorea chinensis, Shorea assamica and Hopea, in agreement with the plastomes ML tree. In addition, the genus Dipterocarpus diverged from a clade containing P. chinensis, S. assamica and the genus Hopea. D. alatus was associated in the basal position with the D. turbinatus- D. retusus clade, like in the plastomes ML tree, as well as Hopea hainanensis in the genus Hopea. The four trees retrieved the same placement for Vatica (Fig. 6b).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Total evidence (plastomes + NRC) of the complete dataset of Chinese Dipterocarpaceae, Dipterocarpus alatus and Vatica rassak, and outgroups retrieved from GenBank. (a) MrBayes phylogenomic tree. (b) Maximum Likelihood phylogenomic tree (bootstrap support values shown at nodes).

Total evidence MrBayes phylogenomic tree

The tree generated with MrBayes v3.238 using complete plastomes and NRC sequences showed highly supported nodes throughout (PP:1). It displayed the same topology like the ML tree (Fig. 6a).

Comparative plastome analyses

Interspecific analysis using mVISTA43,44 of eleven Dipterocarpaceae species, eight species of Malvales, plus Arabidopsis thaliana, showed the plastomes of Chinese Dipterocarpaceae species were highly conserved in their structures (Fig. 7). Among coding regions, the most conserved coding regions were rpl23, rrn16S, ndhB, rps7, psbD, psbC, whereas atpF, atpA, trnR-TCT, ndhK, ndhJ, rpoC2, rps4, ccsA and ycf2 coding regions were the most variable. The highest level of variations was detected in non-coding regions that could therefore be used for phylogenetic analyses. The most variable non-coding regions were the rps16-trnQ-TTG, rpl33-rps18, trnL-ndhB, trnN-rps15, trnL-rpl32, rpl32-ndhF spacers, and between the 16S and 23S ribosomal subunits. The most conserved non-coding regions were the ndhB-rps7 and, trnI-ycf2 spacers (Fig. 7). Notably, several major deletions (50%) in both outgroups and ingroups occur in 23S ribosomal subunits.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

mVISTA alignment and percent identity plot of plastomes of Dipterocarpaceae and outgroups. Similarity is expressed relative to Dipterocarpus turbinatus, used as a reference for annotations. Arrows represent the transcriptional direction. Vertical scale indicates the percentage of identity ranging from 50% to 100%. Coding regions are in blue while non- coding are in pink.

Discussion

The number of publicly available plastomes, despite growing rapidly with the technical development, remains very limited in Dipterocarpaceae45,46. Our previous study45 highlighted the relationships of major lineages in Malvales were not congruent with those previously published elsewhere. Here, we provide genomics resources in an attempt to place our dataset in a broader taxonomic framework and further clarify those relationships. In this study, we generated 11 new complete plastomes of Dipterocarpaceae and compared them in combination with a set of other taxa spread throughout Malvales and Arabidopsis thaliana. Dipterocarpaceae in China are distributed throughout five different genera. Comparative analyses confirmed different levels of variation in repeated sequences in plastomes, but similar SSRs diversity and characteristics.

Microsatellites [(SSRs) or short tandem repeats (STR)] are a commonly used marker system in plant genetics and breeding42. Chloroplastic microsatellites were widely used in population genetics of Dipterocarpaceae to assess genetic variation and population spatial structure at lower spatial and temporal scale47–49, and the genetic diversity and gene flow with closely related species50. Our analyses of repeated regions, microsatellites, and the comparative plastomes analyses showed that a higher portion of the number and characteristics variations were found between species than between genera. This suggest that microsatellites loci can be more efficient in delineating closely related species than either distant species or genera.

In Malvales, phylogenetic relationships among Cistaceae, Dipterocarpaceae and Sarcolaenaceae remain unclear51. Using either single-locus approached [rbcL52,53], or multi-loci methods [rbcL, trnK-matK-trnK and trnT-trnL-trnF plastid regions54] previous studies still have not certainly resolved their evolutionary placement. Using both chloroplast (atpB, matK, ndhF, and rbcL) and mitochondrial (matR) loci to reconstruct a phylogenomic tree of Chinese vascular plants55, Chen et al. retrieved a paraphyletic Dipterocarpaceae family. In addition, previous studies highlighted the unresolved phylogenetic placement of Dipterocarpaceae50,54,56, as well as its uncertain origin (despite the monophyly of the family is supported by a common ectomycorrhizal ancestor57,58). We found low levels of genomic variation in the family, although our sampling was not designed to test monophyly of the family.

Short terminal branches in our analyses and similar patterns of variations in plastomes for all Chinese species highlight the low levels of genomic variation in the family. These short internal branches suggest a recent rapid diversification of Dipterocarpaceae at their Northern distribution range and elsewhere, as found in other taxonomic groups highlighting recent diversifications during the Oligocene and the Miocene (e.g.59). However, our sampling - a small fraction of all species in the family - cannot be used for dating, as it would be strongly sensitive to any error in substitution rate estimations. Moreover, unreliable and rare fossils of the family on nodes that are likely evolutionary distant that the actual nodes a fossil should calibrate, could result in a high level of uncertainty. Nonetheless, our genomic resources could be the base for further more detailed and accurate calibration studies.

In Dipterocarpaceae, relationships between Hopea, Shorea and Parashorea remain unclear60–63. In our study Shorea is close to Parashorea than to Hopea clade, opening questions for still uncertain phylogenetic relationships among the two biggest genera in the family. Phylogenetic placement of two genera Dipterocarpus and Vatica is still uncertain54,61,63. The incongruent NRC and plastome datasets highlighted complex and different ways of evolution of these genera. Even though hybridization among Hopea and Shorea could be one of the reasons for the incongruence between plastome and NRC data, further studies are needed to conclude.

By nature, standardized markers widely used across large taxonomic ranges show low level of variation64,65. Although useful for studies at higher taxonomic levels, this severely limits their power to delineate phylogenetic relationships in large, complex, evolutionary young groups like Dipterocarpaceae56. Using a genome-based approach combining plastomes with NRC sequences, we obtained a dataset of more than 160,000 bp that provides a robustly supported backbone at the family and the genus level, but also the relationships among included species.

NRC sequence, (i.e. tandemly repeated transcription units of the nuclear ribosomal DNA, or nrDNA) consist of an intergenic spacer (IGS), ITS 1 and 2 (ITS1, ITS2), the 5.8S rDNA gene, the small- (SSU- 18S) and the large-subunit (LSU- 5.8S and 28S) rDNA gene. The first part of the IGS (commonly referred as ETS - External Transcribed Spacer) and the two ITS regions have higher level of substitution rates due to their relaxed functional constraint and rapid evolution66. rRNA genes are usually more conserved, because their transcripts are directly involved in the formation of ribosomes66–68, and thus highly constrained. Our interspecific NRC analyses showed similar length of NRC. Only 5.8S rDNA gene had higher level of variability than expected, according to its conserved structure, likely due to the lack of a set of properly annotated sequences in databases used for our annotations transfer. Indeed, the exact boundaries of the rDNA genes were determined using the relatively distant, Theobroma grandiflorum as a reference.

Finally, because Dipterocarpaceae are the economical cornerstone of tropical forestry in Asia, generating ecological, genomic and morphological resources is an essential step towards conservation of genetic resources and long-term sustainable use.

Conclusions

Here, we assembled a dataset comprising nearly all Dipterocarpaceae species occurring at the Northernmost margin of the family and several core-Asian species (both in the family and in Malvales s.l.). Comparison of genomic diversity at different taxonomic levels (intergeneric and intrageneric) showed low level of genomic diversity among analysed range-edge species, and the incongruence between plastome and NRC data.

Our study provide genomics resources for further detailed assessment of these species characteristics (e.g. demography, population structure, admixture history69), and a base to understand how edge-species distribution respond to changing environment in terms of their abundance, range of distribution and extinction, as highly vulnerable groups49,70,71. It could therefore be used for further comparative analyses between Chinese Dipterocarpaceae occurring on the edge, and SE Asia Dipterocarpaceae species in the core of their distribution, conservation and sustainable use of these crucial Asian forest resources, and the reconstruction of the evolutionary history of the whole Dipterocarpaceae family.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (555KB, pdf)
Dataset 1 (25.5KB, xlsx)
Dataset 2 (27.5KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Yunnan) and the Guilin Institute of Botany (GIB) for their kind assistance in our ongoing sampling efforts. This work was supported by a China Scholarship Council scholarship to T.C. (No. 2016GXZS80), Grants from Guangxi University (Nanning), the State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources (GXU) and the provincial government of Guangxi Province (“100 Talents” Program; recruitment of overseas talents for colleges and universities in Guangxi) to J.S.S. and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grants (Nos 2015M582481 and 2016T90822) to D.D.H. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Author Contributions

T.C. performed the experiments and analyses. D.D.H. and J.S.S. designed the experiments and collected samples. All authors equally contributed to the writing, edition and review of the manuscript, and approved the final version for submission.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Tijana Cvetković, Damien Daniel Hinsinger and Joeri Sergej Strijk contributed equally.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-48240-y.

References

  • 1.FAO. State of the World’s Forests: Enhancing the Socioeconomic Benefits from Forests. Rome: FAO (2014).
  • 2.Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C. & Moss, R. H. Climate Change 1995: The IPCC Second Assessment Report: Scientific-Technical Analyses of Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press (1996).
  • 3.Dewees PA. Bouncing back: Forests, Tress, and Resilient Households. Midwives. 2013;17:21–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kumar, C., Begeladze, S., Calmon, M. & Saint-Laurent, C. Enhancing Food Security Through Forest Landscape Restoration: Lessons From Burkina Faso, Brazil, Guatemala, Viet Nam, Ghana, Ethiopia and Philippines. (Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 2015).
  • 5.Aronson J, Alexander S. Ecosystem restoration is now a global priority: Time to Roll up our Sleeves. Restor. Ecol. 2013;21:293–296. doi: 10.1111/rec.12011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hanson, C., Buckingham, K., Dewitt, S. & Laestradius, L. The Restoration Diagnostic: A Method for Developing Forest Landscape Restoration Strategies by Rapidly Assessing the Status of Key Success Factors. IUCN and WRI (2015).
  • 7.Beerling DJ, Royer DL. Convergent Cenozoic CO2 history. Nat. Geosci. 2011;4:418–420. doi: 10.1038/ngeo1186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Raxworthy CJ, et al. Extinction vulnerability of tropical montane endemism from warming and upslope displacement: a preliminary appraisal for the highest massif in Madagascar. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2008;14:1703–1720. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01596.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kier G, et al. A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009;106:9322–9327. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810306106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fu Q, Johanson CM, Wallace JM, Reichler T. Enhanced Mid-latitude Tropospheric Warming in Satellite Measurements. Science. 2006;312:1179. doi: 10.1126/science.1125566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seidel DJ, Fu Q, Randel WJ, Reichler TJ. Widening of the tropical belt in a changing climate. Nat. Geosci. 2008;1:21–24. doi: 10.1038/ngeo.2007.38. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hudson RD, Andrade MF, Follette MB, Frolov AD. The total ozone field separated into meteorological regimes Part II: Northern Hemisphere mid-latitude total ozone trends. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2006;6:5183–5191. doi: 10.5194/acp-6-5183-2006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hu Y, Fu Q. Observed poleward expansion of the Hadley circulation since 1979. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007;7:5229–5236. doi: 10.5194/acp-7-5229-2007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Seidel DJ, Randel WJ. Recent widening of the tropical belt: Evidence from tropopause observations. J. Geophys. Res. 2007;112:D20113. doi: 10.1029/2007JD008861. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Brook BW, Ng PKL. Southeast Asian biodiversity: An impending disaster. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004;19:654–660. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Evans, K. A. & Guariguata, M. R. Success from the ground up: Participatory monitoring and forest restoration. Occas. Pap. 159. Bogor, Indones. CIFOR (2016).
  • 17.Cannon CH, Peart DR, Leighton M, Kartawinata K. The structure of lowland rainforest after selective logging in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. For. Ecol. Manage. 1994;67:49–68. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(94)90007-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Di Capua G, Coumou D. Changes in meandering of the Northern Hemisphere circulation. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016;11:094028. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Way DA, Oren R. Differential responses to changes in growth temperature between trees from different functional groups and biomes: a review and synthesis of data. Tree Physiol. 2010;30:669–688. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpq015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Udvardy, M. D. F. A Classification of the Biogeographical Provinces of the World. IUCN Occasional Paper No. 18, Morges, Switzerland (1975).
  • 21.Kooyman, R. M. et al. Origins and Assembly of Malesian Rainforests. Ann. Rev. of Ecol. Evol. and Syst. 50, (in press) (2019).
  • 22.Corlett RT, Lafrankie JV. Potential impact of climate change on tropical Asian forests through an influence of phenology. Clim. Chang. 1998;39:439. doi: 10.1023/A:1005328124567. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Deb JC, Phinn S, Butt N, McAlpine CA. The impact of climate change on the distribution of two threatened Dipterocarp trees. Ecol. Evol. 2017;7:2238–2248. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wangcheng Q. Effects of deforestation on flood characteristics with particular reference to Hainan Island. China. Proc. Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci. Publ. 1983;140:249–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhai DL, Cannon CH, Slik FJW, Zhang CP, Zhi CD. Rubber and pulp plantations represent a double threat to Hainan’s natural tropical forests. J. Environ. Manage. 2012;96:64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhai DL, Xu JC, Dai ZC, Cannon CH, Grumbine RE. Increasing tree cover while losing diverse natural forests in tropical Hainan, China. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2014;14:611–621. doi: 10.1007/s10113-013-0512-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Boucher D, et al. The Root of the Problem what’s driving tropical deforestation today? Union Concerned Sci. 2011;61(5–8):21-28 101-110. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Köppen, W. Die Wärmezonen der Erde, nach der Dauer der heissen, gemässigten und kalten Zeit und nach der Wirkung der Wärme auf die organische Welt betrachtet (The thermal zones of the Earth according to the duration of hot, moderate and cold periods and to the impact of heat on the organic world). Meteorol. Z. 1, 215–226 (1884). (translated and edited by Volken E. and S. Brönnimann. Meteorol. Z. 20, 351–360 (2011)).
  • 29.Zhu H. A biogeographical study on tropical flora of southern China. Ecol. Evol. 2017;00:1–11. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rad JE, Manthey M, Mataji A. Comparison of plant species diversity with different plant communities in deciduous forests. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2009;6:389–394. doi: 10.1007/BF03326077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.ORG.ASM. ORG.ASM: organellar assembler [Internet]. Available from, http://pythonhosted.org/ORG.asm/ (Date of access 12/4/2018) (2016).
  • 32.Kearse M, et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu C, et al. CpGAVAS, an integrated web server for the annotation, visualization, analysis, and GenBank submission of completely sequenced chloroplast genome sequences. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:715. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics. 2019;00:1–3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Darriba, D. et. al. ModelTest-NG: a new and scalable tool for theselection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. bioRxiv, 10.1101/612903 (2019).
  • 37.Morariu, V. I., Srinivasan, B. V., Raykar, V. C., Duraiswami, R. & Davis., L. S. Automatic online tuning for fast Gaussian summation. In: NIPS (2008).
  • 38.Ronquist F, et al. Mrbayes 3.2: Efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Bio. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kurtz S, Schleiermacher C. REPuter: fast computation of maximal repeats in complete genomes. Bioinformatics. 1999;15:426–427. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.5.426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jiang G, Hinsinger DD, Strijk JS. Comparison of intraspecific, interspecific and intergeneric chloroplast diversity in Cycads. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:31473. doi: 10.1038/srep31473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hinsinger DD, Strijk JS. Toward phylogenomics of Lauraceae: The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Litsea glutinosa (Lauraceae), an invasive tree species on Indian and Pacific Ocean islands. Plant Gene. 2017;9:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.plgene.2016.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Beier S, Thiel T, Münch T, Scholz U, Mascher M. MISA-web: a web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2583–2585. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mayor C, et al. Bioinformatics. 2000. VISTA: Visualizing global DNA sequence alignments of arbitrary length; pp. 1046–1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004. VISTA: Computational tools for comparative genomics; pp. 273–279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cvetković T, Hinsinger DD, Strijk JS. The first complete chloroplast sequence of a major tropical timber tree in the Meranti family: Vatica odorata (Dipterocarpaceae) Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2017;2(1):52–53. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2016.1275837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Heckenhauer J, et al. Molecular phylogenomics of the tribe Shoreeae (Dipterocarpaceae) using whole plastid genomes. Ann. Bot. 2018;XX:1–9. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Javed AM, Cannon CH, Wickneswari R. Microsatellite DNA markers in Shorea platyclados (Dipterocarpaceae): genetic diversity, size homoplasy and mother trees. J. For. Sci. 2014;60:18–27. doi: 10.17221/71/2013-JFS. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tam NM, Duy VD, Duc NM, Giap VD, Xuan BT. Genetic variation in and spatial structure of natural populations of Dipterocarpus alatus (Dipterocarpaceae) determined using single sequence repeat markers. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13:5378–5386. doi: 10.4238/2014.July.24.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ng KKS, Lee SL, Saw LG, Plotkin JB, Koh CL. Spatial structure and genetic diversity of three tropical tree species with different habitat preferences within a natural forest. Tree Genet. Genomes. 2006;2:121–131. doi: 10.1007/s11295-006-0035-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Guo JJ, Shang SB, Wang CS, Zhao ZG, Zeng J. Twenty Microsatellite Markers for the Endangered Vatica mangachapoi (Dipterocarpaceae) Appl. Plant Sci. 2017;5:1600134. doi: 10.3732/apps.1600134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.APG [Angiosperm Phylogeny Group] An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016;141:399–436. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Morton CM, Dayanandan S, Dissanayake D. Phylogeny and biosystematics of Pseudomonotes (Dipterocarpaceae) based on molecular and morphological data. Plant Syst. Evol. 1999;216:197–205. doi: 10.1007/BF01084398. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dayanandan S, Ashton PS, Williams SM, Primack RB. Phylogeny of the tropical tree family Dipterocarpaceae based on nucleotide sequences of the chloroplast rbcL gene. Am. J. Bot. 1999;86:1182–1190. doi: 10.2307/2656982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Heckenhauer J, et al. Phylogenetic analyses of plastid DNA suggest a different interpretation of morphological evolution than those used as the basis for previous classifications of Dipterocarpaceae (Malvales) Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2017;20:31–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chen ZD, et al. Tree of life for the genera of Chinese vascular plants. J. Syst. Evol. 2016;54:277–306. doi: 10.1111/jse.12219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Trang NTP, Duc NM, Sinh NV, Triest L. Application of DNA barcoding markers to the identification of Hopea species. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015;14:9181–9190. doi: 10.4238/2015.August.7.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ducousso M, et al. The last common ancestor of Sarcolaenaceae and Asian dipterocarp trees was ectomycorrhizal before the India-Madagascar separation, about 88 million years ago. Mol. Ecol. 2004;13:231–236. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02032.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Moyersoen B. Pakaraimaea dipterocarpacea is ectomycorrhizal, indicating an ancient Gondwanaland origin for the ectomycorrhizal habit in Dipterocarpaceae. New Phytol. 2006;172:753–762. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01860.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ghazoul, J. Dipterocarp Biology, Ecology, and Conservation. (Oxford University Press, 2016).
  • 60.Li QM, Hua HTH, Xu ZF. Generic relationships of Parashorea chinensis Wang Hsie (Dipterocarpaceae) based on cpDNA sequences. Taxon. 2004;53:461–466. doi: 10.2307/4135622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kamiya K, Harada K, Tachida H, Ashton PS. Phylogeny of PgiC gene in Shorea and its closely related genera (Dipterocarpaceae), the dominant trees in Southeast Asian tropical rain forests. Am. J. Bot. 2005;92:775–788. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.5.775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Heckenhauer J, Samuel R, Ashton PS, Abu Salim K, Paun O. Phylogenomics resolves evolutionary relationships and provides insights into floral evolution in the tribe Shoreeae (Dipterocarpaceae) Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2018;127:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sun M, et al. Phylogeny of the Rosidae: A dense taxon sampling analysis. J. Syst. Evol. 2016;54:363–391. doi: 10.1111/jse.12211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kress WJ, Erickson DL. DNA barcodes: Genes, genomics, and bioinformatics. PNAS. 2008;105:2761–2762. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800476105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kane N, et al. Ultra-barcoding in cacao (Theobroma spp.; Malvaceae) using whole chloroplast genomes and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Am. J. Bot. 2012;99:320–329. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Harper JT, Saunders GW. The application of sequences of the ribosomal cistron to the systematics and classification of the florideophyte red algae (Florideophyceae, Rhodophyta) Cah. Biol. Mar. 2001;42:25–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Appels, R. & Honeycutt, R. L. rDNA: evolution over a billion years. In: Dutta SK DNA Syst. vol 2. CRC Press. Boca Rat. 81–135 (1986).
  • 68.Li X, et al. The complete nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) cistron sequence of Pyropia yezoensis (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) J. Appl. Phycol. 2016;28:663–669. doi: 10.1007/s10811-015-0522-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tollefsrud MM, et al. Genetic Structure in the Northern Range Margins of Common Ash, Fraxinus excelsior L. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0167104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sexton JP, McIntyre PJ, Angert AL, Rice KJ. Evolution and Ecology of Species Range Limits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009;40:415–436. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Assis J, et al. High and Distinct Range-Edge Genetic Diversity despite Local Bottlenecks. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO & Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA. eFloras. Available from, http://www.efloras.org (Date of access 20/4/2018) (2008).
  • 73.Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, USA. Tropicos.org [Internet]. Available from, https://www.tropicos.org (Date of access 20/4/2018) (2018).
  • 74.GBIF.org. GBIF Home Page. Available from, https://www.gbif.org (Date of access 20/4/2018) (2018).
  • 75.Slik, J. W. F. Plants of Southeast Asia. Available from, http://www.asianplant.net/ (2009 onwards) (Date of access 20/4/2018).
  • 76.POWO. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available from, http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (Date of access 4/5/2018) (2018).
  • 77.WCSP. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available from, http://wcsp.science.kew.org/ (Date of access 4/5/2018) (2018).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (555KB, pdf)
Dataset 1 (25.5KB, xlsx)
Dataset 2 (27.5KB, xlsx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES