Table 1.
Parameter | At risk group | HR [95% CI] | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Univariate analysis | ||||
Gender | Male (vs Female) | 1.68 [0.97, 2.89] | 0.064 | |
Age | Continuous | 0.99 [0.97, 1.02] | 0.545 | |
ECOG Performance status | 1 (vs 0) | 1.77 [0.77, 4.08] | 0.179 | |
>=2 (vs)) | 4.34 [1.72, 10.96] | 0.002 | ||
ORR | Response (vs no response) | 0.31 [0.13, 0.76] | 0.010 | |
Metastasis | Number of metastatic sites | >=2 sites (vs <2 sites) | 1.31 [0.66, 2.62] | 0.44 |
Liver metastasis | Yes (vs No) | 3.05 [1.70, 5.51] | <0.001 | |
Lung metastasis | Yes (vs No) | 0.77 [0.35, 1.67] | 0.505 | |
Other sites | Yes (vs No) | 1.61 [0.68, 3.83] | 0.283 | |
WCC$ | Continuous | 1.18 [1.11, 1.25] | <0.001 | |
Neutrophils$ | Continuous | 1.19 [1.11, 1.26] | <0.001 | |
Lymphocytes | Continuous | 0.72 [0.46, 1.12] | 0.143 | |
LDH | Continuous | 1.001 [1.000, 1.003] | 0.003 | |
Ca 19.9 (Log2) | Continuous | 1.07 [0.99, 1.16] | 0.091 | |
CNA | Continuous | 7.09 [3.19, 15.78] | <0.001 | |
Mutational burden | Number of mutations$ | Continuous | 1.06 [1.01, 1.12] | 0.028 |
Number of KRAS mutations$ | Continuous | 1.11 [1.07, 1.16] | <0.001 | |
KRAS mutations present | Yes (vs No) | 3.46 [1.76, 6.77] | <0.001 | |
KRAS copy number gain | Yes (vs No) | 10.94 [3.85, 31.08] | <0.001 | |
Highest VAF | Continuous | 1.07 [1.04, 1.10] | <0.001 | |
Multivariable analysis | ||||
ECOG Performance status | 1 (vs 0) | 2.51 [0.98, 6.38] | 0.053 | |
>=2 (vs 0) | 4.20 [1.48, 11.94] | 0.007 | ||
Metastasis | Liver metastasis | Yes (vs No) | 2.83 [1.28, 6.24] | 0.010 |
Mutational burden | KRAS copy number gain | Yes (vs No) | 3.47 [1.19, 10.17] | 0.023 |
Highest VAF | Continuous | 1.05 [1.01, 1.08] | 0.005 |
Abbreviations: ORR, objective response rate (clinical outcome variable); VAF: variant allele frequency; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; WCC: white cell count; $, Excluded from stepwise model building due to collinearity.