Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 12;9:11614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47950-7

Table 1.

Distribution of NLRs and their subfamily assignation in seven conifer transcriptomes.

Abies balsamea Larix laricina Picea glauca Picea mariana Pinus banksiana Pinus strobus Thuja occidentalis Dist (%)
Number of transcripts 46178 50712 37491 58751 47473 45447 38767
TOTAL NLR 338 633 506 725 486 560 486
Ratios 0.73% 1.25% 1.35% 1.23% 1.02% 1.23% 1.25%
Non-TIR-NLR CNL
     NBCNL–(LRR) 65 146 115 166 82 103 51 22%
     Ratios 0.14% 0.29% 0.31% 0.28% 0.17% 0.23% 0.13%
CNL2
     NBCNL2–(LRR) 47 18 17 17 36 21 34 6%
     Ratios 0.10% 0.04% 0.05% 0.03% 0.08% 0.05% 0.09%
RNL
     RPW8 5 5 6 13 8 12 3 9%
     NBRNL–(LRR) 11 8 6 10 21 12 13
     RPW8–NBRNL–(LRR) 16 33 19 16 26 16 15
     Total RNL-related 32 46 31 43 55 40 31
     Ratios 0.07% 0.09% 0.08% 0.07% 0.12% 0.09% 0.08%
TIR-NLR TNL
     TIR 43 100 121 144 94 89 72 63%
     NBTNL–(LRR) 52 97 99 128 104 122 91
     TIR–NBTNL–(LRR) 55 143 58 105 52 126 154
     TIR–LRR 0 3 1 2 0 2 0
     Total TNL-related 150 343 279 379 250 339 317
     Ratios 0.32% 0.68% 0.74% 0.65% 0.53% 0.75% 0.82%
Atypical NLR 15 26 8 14 7 14 14
Undetermined NLR 29 54 56 106 56 43 39

The distribution is calculated using the total sequence number of each subfamilies in proportion of the total of assigned sequences (CNL, CNL2, RNL and TNL).