Table 1.
Abies balsamea | Larix laricina | Picea glauca | Picea mariana | Pinus banksiana | Pinus strobus | Thuja occidentalis | Dist† (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of transcripts | 46178 | 50712 | 37491 | 58751 | 47473 | 45447 | 38767 | ||
TOTAL NLR | 338 | 633 | 506 | 725 | 486 | 560 | 486 | ||
Ratios | 0.73% | 1.25% | 1.35% | 1.23% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.25% | ||
Non-TIR-NLR | CNL | ||||||||
NBCNL–(LRR) | 65 | 146 | 115 | 166 | 82 | 103 | 51 | 22% | |
Ratios | 0.14% | 0.29% | 0.31% | 0.28% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.13% | ||
CNL2 | |||||||||
NBCNL2–(LRR) | 47 | 18 | 17 | 17 | 36 | 21 | 34 | 6% | |
Ratios | 0.10% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.03% | 0.08% | 0.05% | 0.09% | ||
RNL | |||||||||
RPW8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 3 | 9% | |
NBRNL–(LRR) | 11 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 21 | 12 | 13 | ||
RPW8–NBRNL–(LRR) | 16 | 33 | 19 | 16 | 26 | 16 | 15 | ||
Total RNL-related | 32 | 46 | 31 | 43 | 55 | 40 | 31 | ||
Ratios | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.12% | 0.09% | 0.08% | ||
TIR-NLR | TNL | ||||||||
TIR | 43 | 100 | 121 | 144 | 94 | 89 | 72 | 63% | |
NBTNL–(LRR) | 52 | 97 | 99 | 128 | 104 | 122 | 91 | ||
TIR–NBTNL–(LRR) | 55 | 143 | 58 | 105 | 52 | 126 | 154 | ||
TIR–LRR | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | ||
Total TNL-related | 150 | 343 | 279 | 379 | 250 | 339 | 317 | ||
Ratios | 0.32% | 0.68% | 0.74% | 0.65% | 0.53% | 0.75% | 0.82% | ||
Atypical NLR | 15 | 26 | 8 | 14 | 7 | 14 | 14 | ||
Undetermined NLR | 29 | 54 | 56 | 106 | 56 | 43 | 39 |
†The distribution is calculated using the total sequence number of each subfamilies in proportion of the total of assigned sequences (CNL, CNL2, RNL and TNL).