Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;12(7):1371–1384. doi: 10.1111/eva.12758

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Sex‐specific sensitivity to elevated temperature and associated costs of sociosexual interactions for the three evolution regimes. (a) Relativized competitive LRS is presented separately for each evolution regime to emphasize sex‐specific robustness to elevated temperature in each regime. Error bars represent standard errors. (b) The cost of sociosexual interactions was calculated as 1‐(population fitness/fertility) and represents the relative drop in offspring production per female between a single monogamous mating and a polygamous group setting from Bayesian posterior modes and 95% credible intervals