Table 1.
Conservation context | Evolutionary application and goal | References |
---|---|---|
Management of small, endangered populations | Genetic rescue from inbreeding depression through outbreeding | Westemeier et al. (1998); Pimm, Dollar, and Bass (2017); Frankham (2015) |
Evolutionary rescue via standing or de novo genetic variation | ||
Captive breeding programs | Minimizing of rapid adaptation to captivity | Fraser (2008); Bowlby and Gibson (2011); Christie et al. (2012) |
Demographic rescue | ||
Reintroduction programs | Adaptive matching of source populations | Lesica and Allendorf (1999); Houde et al. (2015) |
Interactions between domesticated and wild species | Mitigating gene flow between domesticated escapees and wild populations | Hindar et al. (2006); Hutchings and Fraser (2008) |
Sustainable harvesting, populations | Reducing selectivity (e.g., harvesting of faster growing, later maturing individuals) to avoid undesirable genetic changes to various traits | Heino et al. (2015); Kuparinen and Festa‐Bianchet (2017) |
Sustainable harvesting, ecosystems | Reducing selectivity in harvesting to reduce undesirable changes to trophic cascades, communities and ecosystems | Palkovacs et al. (2018) |
Endangered species legislation, and designation of conservation units below the species level | Conserving populations harboring unique adaptive characteristics to increase species’ evolutionary potential | Waples (1995); Funk et al. (2012) |
Species climate change adaptation | Identifying traits which facilitate or limit adaptive responses to climate change | Donelson, Wong, Booth, and Munday (2016); Schunter et al. (2018) |
Determining the significance of transgenerational plasticity for responses to climate change |
Some conservation strategies focus more on adaptive state and others more on adaptive process (Figure 1b), though these goals are not mutually exclusive in many instances.