Table 1.
Detailed overview of the diagnostic performance.
| Performance | LE (95% CI) | CESM (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (%) | 90.8 (81.0–96.6) | 93.8 (85.0–98.3) |
| Specificity (%) | 39.0 (28.4–50.4) | 36.6 (26.2–48.0) |
| Positive predicted value (%) | 54.1 (49.4–58.8) | 54.0 (49.6–58.3) |
| Negative predicted value (%) | 84.2 (70.4–92.3) | 88.2 (73.6–95.3) |
| Mean diameter (PCC) | 0.91 (0.805) | 3.56 (0.785) |
|
Performance – Absolute numbers (n = 147) |
LE |
CESM |
| True positive | 59 | 61 |
| True negative | 32 | 30 |
| False positive | 50 | 52 |
| False negative | 6 | 4 |
|
Bland–Altman plot |
LE |
CESM |
| Mean | 0.2615 | 4.492 |
| LOA upper | 39.665 | 36.261 |
| LOA lower | –39.142 | –27.276 |
CI, confidence interval; PCC, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; LOA, limits of agreement.