. 2019 Jul 30;7(7):e14785. doi: 10.2196/14785

Table 2.

Text message–based assessment process data: changes in the sugar-sweetened beverage consumption category and changes in personalized strategy choices.

Process data variable		Participants at baseline (n=27)^a, n (%)	Participants at follow-up (n=24)^a, n (%)
Caregiver and adolescent sugar-sweetened beverage intake category^b
	Caregiver consumer/adolescent consumer	19 (70)	8 (33)
	Caregiver consumer/adolescent nonconsumer	1 (4)	1 (4)
	Caregiver nonconsumer/adolescent consumer	3 (11)	11 (46)
	Caregiver nonconsumer/adolescent nonconsumer	4 (15)	4 (17)
Chosen personalized strategy^c
	Home and shopping strategies	12 (44)	11 (46)
	Parenting strategies	4 (15)	3 (12)
	Strategies to find tasty alternatives	3 (11)	2 (8)
	Strategies to break habit	4 (15)	4 (17)
	Positive reinforcement or qualitative response	4 (15)	4 (17)

^aOnly considers caregivers that fully completed both baseline and follow-up assessments. At baseline, there were 3 partial completers and 1 nonresponder. At follow-up, there were 2 partial completers and 5 nonresponders. Participants were considered partial completer if they did not respond to all 3 assessment questions and if missing data were not considered in the calculations for changes in consumption category and personalized strategy choice.

^bCategories were assigned based on responses to assessment. Caregivers and adolescents were considered consumers if SSB intake was ≥2 to 3 times per week.

^cCaregivers who were consumers or had an adolescent that was a consumer were given the choice between strategies. Nonconsumers received positive reinforcement messages or were asked for some tips they would give other families.