Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 10;10(18):4305–4317. doi: 10.7150/jca.31598

Table 2.

Subgroup analyses of the associations between RDW and OS in cancer.

Stratified analyses No. of patients No. of studies Model Pooled HR (95%CI) P value PD value Heterogeneity
I2 PH value
Tumor type <0.001
Hematologic malignancies 1979 10 fixed 2.046 (1.623-2.580) <0.001 21.2% 0.248
MM 748 5 fixed 1.692 (1.256-2.281) 0.001 18.8% 0.295
DLBCL 881 2 fixed 3.178 (1.853-5.450) <0.001 0.0% 0.793
UGI cancer 3805 6 random 1.091 (0.925-1.286) 0.303 73.4% 0.001
HCC 1510 5 random 1.430 (1.232-1.660) <0.001 79.9% <0.001
NSCLC 2304 4 random 1.440 (1.103-1.880) 0.007 57.2% 0.053
Breast cancer 2627 3 random 2.092 (0.833-5.255) 0.116 80.3% 0.006
Colorectal carcinoma 843 3 fixed 1.932 (1.397-2.673) <0.001 0.0% 0.521
Gliomas 287 2 fixed 1.466 (1.129-1.904) <0.001 23.9% 0.252
UTUC 420 1* fixed 2.172 (1.599-2.949) <0.001 3.5% 0.309
Stage <0.001
Mix stage 16786 33 random 1.494 (1.372-1.626) <0.001 80.5% <0.001
Early stage 1545 5 fixed 1.690 (1.180-2.422) 0.004 41.0% 0.148
Advanced Stage 1416 6 random 1.717 (1.235-2.386) 0.001 57.7% 0.038
Age <0.001
≤60 7979 19 random 1.590 (1.321-1.914) <0.001 82.6% <0.001
>60 7992 22 random 1.515 (1.351-1.699) <0.001 75.7% <0.001
Gender distribution <0.001
Female dominant 5059 9 random 1.401 (1.153-1.703) 0.001 74.9% 0.001
Balanced 6418 21 random 1.696 (1.441-1.997) <0.001 74.8% <0.001
Male dominant 5325 14 random 1.413 (1.232-1.620) <0.001 81.6% <0.001
Country <0.001
Eastern 10608 28 random 1.716 (1.458-2.020) <0.001 79.8% <0.001
Western 8180 17 random 1.316 (1.203-1.439) <0.001 80.9% <0.001
Cut-off value <0.001
>15% 3356 6 random 1.608 (1.107-2.335) 0.013 89.5% <0.001
>14% and ≤ 15% 7911 21 random 1.510 (1.351-1.688) <0.001 79.2% <0.001
>13% and ≤ 14% 3409 11 random 1.869 (1.493-2.340) <0.001 57.5% 0.004
≤13% 1982 5 fixed 1.534 (1.262-1.865) <0.001 0.0% 0.655
Definition of cut-off value <0.001
ROC curve analysis 6276 22 fixed 1.569 (1.434-1.718) <0.001 42.6% 0.015
Upper limit 3558 11 random 1.504 (1.296-1.746) <0.001 70.8% 0.000
Median 2357 3 random 1.400 (0.961-2.040) 0.080 62.4% 0.046
4th quartile 2757 3 random 1.647 (1.430-1.897) <0.001 0.0% 0.645
Arbitrary# 922 5 random 1.682 (1.073-2.638) 0.023 63.2% 0.028
HR calculation <0.001
Multivariate 13572 28 random 1.477 (1.342-1.626) <0.001 83.9% <0.001
Univariate 4275 17 fixed 1.525 (1.380-1.686) <0.001 8.5% 0.355

Abbreviations: MM = Multiple Myeloma; DLBCL = Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; UGI cancer = upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI) cancers (including esophagus cancer, gastric cancer, and small intestine cancer); HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma; NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer; UTUC = upper tract urothelial carcinoma; OS = overall survival; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; PD = P for subgroup difference; PH = P for heterogeneity.

*: Cheng et al 2015 separately evaluated the survival outcome in two cohorts, which were derivation cohort and validation cohort.

#: Definition of cut-offs value of RDW was based on previous study.

‡: HRs were extracted from multivariate cox proportional hazards models, univariate cox proportional hazards models or survival curve analysis.