Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Feb 3;43(3):465–472. doi: 10.1111/acer.13951

Table 2.

Comparison of trajectory models by AIC, BIC, entropy, posterior probabilities, and sample size per class.

Number
of classes
AIC BIC Entropy Median Posterior Probability per
Class
Sample Size per Class (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 −5601101 −5601129 -- 1.00 100 -- -- -- -- --
2* -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
3 −3986857 −3986951 0.841 1.00/0.98/1.00 38.4 39.6 22.1 -- -- --
4 −3928041 −3928169 0.803 0.99/0.93/0.92/0.96 34.4 33.1 25.8 6.8 -- --
5 −3910603 −3910765 0.746 0.96/0.81/0.79/0.88/0.96 31.0 23.9 24.2 18.0 3.0 --
6 −3904701 −3904895 0.689 0.70/0.86/0.74/0.74/0.81/0.94 27.0 14.0 25.4 19.3 12.2 2.1

AIC=Akaike information criterion; BIC=Bayesian information criterion.

*

Did not converge.